Trial reportJournal of human hypertension2011
Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil plus amlodipine in age, gender and hypertension severity defined subgroups of hypertensive patients.
Trial report in Journal of human hypertension, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age- and Sex-Related Differences in Efficacy With an Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and a Calcium Channel Blocker in Asian Hypertensive Patients.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2016Trial
- Efficacy and tolerability of triple-combination therapy with olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide: a subgroup analysis of patients stratified by hypertension severity, age, sex, and obesity.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2014Trial
- Combined olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide therapy in randomized patients with hypertension: a subgroup analysis of the TRINITY study by age.Drugs & aging · 2013Trial
- Pharmacogenomics of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide therapy and the quest for improved control of hypertension: a mini review.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Younger females are at greater risk of vasodilation-related adverse symptoms caused by dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers: results of a study of 11,918 Japanese patients.Clinical drug investigation · 2014Article
- Pharmacogenomics, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: interaction with biological differences between men and women.British journal of pharmacology · 2014Review
- Olmesartan in the treatment of hypertension in elderly patients: a review of the primary evidence.Drugs & aging · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective antihypertensive therapy is crucial for preventing cardiovascular events; however, blood pressure (BP) control rates remain poor. The objective of this analysis was to determine the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine in age, severity and gender-based subgroups of patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension uncontrolled by amlodipine monotherapy. Patients with uncontrolled BP after 8 weeks' amlodipine 5 mg monotherapy (n=755) were randomized to continue amlodipine 5 mg or receive olmesartan (10-40 mg) plus amlodipine 5 mg for 8 weeks. Patients whose BP remained suboptimal were up-titrated to olmesartan/amlodipine 20/5, 40/5 or 40/10 mg. Changes in BP and numbers of controlled patients were calculated separately to assess efficacy in patients aged <65 or ≥65 years, in those with moderate or severe hypertension, and in males and females. The antihypertensive effects of olmesartan/amlodipine were similar in patients aged <65 and ≥65 years of age. Compared with patients with moderate hypertension at baseline, those with severe hypertension tended to show higher decreases in BP, but achieved lower goal rates despite this. Females showed larger mean reductions in diastolic (1.61 mm Hg; P=0.003) and systolic BP (1.72 mm Hg; P=0.053) than males, independent of age and dose. This gender difference appeared to be higher and more consistent across dose groups for patients <50 years of age, but the difference in the pattern between both age groups was not statistically significant (P=0.1526). These results suggest that olmesartan/amlodipine is effective and safe in a wide range of patients, regardless of age or hypertension severity. Small differences in responsiveness between females and males may exist, which require further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20686499What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.