ArticleVeterinary pathology2010
Commentary: mouse genetic nomenclature. Standardization of strain, gene, and protein symbols.
Article in Veterinary pathology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Best practices for data management and sharing in experimental biomedical research.Physiological reviews · 2024Review
- Nomenclature for standardized designation of diploid genotypes in genetically modified laboratory animals.Laboratory animals · 2023Article
- Microfibril-associated protein 5 and the regulation of skin scar formation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Research-Relevant Conditions and Pathology of Laboratory Mice, Rats, Gerbils, Guinea Pigs, Hamsters, Naked Mole Rats, and Rabbits.ILAR journal · 2021Review
- A Standardized Brain Molecular Atlas: A Resource for Systems Modeling and Simulation.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Article
- A fish is not a mouse: understanding differences in background genetics is critical for reproducibility.Lab animal · 2021Review
- Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.PLoS biology · 2020Article
- Immune Relevant and Immune Deficient Mice: Options and Opportunities in Translational Research.ILAR journal · 2018Review
- Pathology Principles and Practices for Analysis of Animal Models.ILAR journal · 2018Article
- A comparison of metabolomic changes in type-1 diabetic C57BL/6N mice originating from different sources.Laboratory animal research · 2018Article
- Comparative study of fatty liver induced by methionine and choline-deficiency in C57BL/6N mice originating from three different sources.Laboratory animal research · 2017Article
- Reproducibility of histopathological findings in experimental pathology of the mouse: a sorry tail.Lab animal · 2017Article
- Article
- Designing phenotyping studies for genetically engineered mice.Veterinary pathology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The use of standard nomenclatures for describing the strains, genes, and proteins of species is vital for the interpretation, archiving, analysis, and recovery of experimental data on the laboratory mouse. At a time when sharing of data and meta-analysis of experimental results is becoming a dominant mode of scientific investigation, failure to respect formal nomenclatures can cause confusion and errors and, in some cases, contribute to poor science. Here, the authors present the basic nomenclature rules for laboratory mice and explain how these rules should be applied to complex genetic manipulations and crosses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.