ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2011
Population admixture, biological invasions and the balance between local adaptation and inbreeding depression.
Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
89 citing papers in PubMed, 304 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human-mediated admixture shapes high genetic diversity and the invasion dynamics of Lupinus nootkatensis in Iceland.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coevolution and Functional Effects of EndosymbioticEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genomic identification of direct seeding and evolutionary lineages by combining heterogeneous genomic resources.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Admixture Increases Genetic Diversity and Adaptive Potential in Australasian Killer Whales.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Article
- Dynamic Genetic Changes Reveal: Intra-Lineage Diversity, Not Admixture, ExplainsInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- QTL mapping for yield contributing traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) using a RIL population.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Anthropogenic Hybridization Contributes to the Naturalization of Introduced Domestic Mallards (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Spatially VaryingEvolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Exploring the complex pre-adaptations of invasive plants to anthropogenic disturbance: a call for integration of archaeobotanical approaches.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
- An experimental field study of inbreeding depression in an outcrossing invasive plant.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Leveraging insect-specific viruses to elucidate mosquito population structure and dynamics.PLoS pathogens · 2023Review
- Multiple Introductions and Distinct Genetic Groups of Canada Goldenrod (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Mitochondrial genome sequencing and analysis of the invasivebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Genetic diversity and structure of a recent fish invasion: Tench (Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Complex patterns shape immune genes diversity during invasion of common raccoon in Europe - Selection in action despite genetic drift.Evolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Population genomics of American mink using genotype data.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Sex-specific effects of inbreeding on body colouration and physiological colour change in the cichlid fish Pelvicachromis taeniatus.BMC ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Changing patterns of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat,Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Challenges in quantifying genome erosion for conservation.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When previously isolated populations meet and mix, the resulting admixed population can benefit from several genetic advantages, including increased genetic variation, the creation of novel genotypes and the masking of deleterious mutations. These admixture benefits are thought to play an important role in biological invasions. In contrast, populations in their native range often remain differentiated and frequently suffer from inbreeding depression owing to isolation. While the advantages of admixture are evident for introduced populations that experienced recent bottlenecks or that face novel selection pressures, it is less obvious why native range populations do not similarly benefit from admixture. Here we argue that a temporary loss of local adaptation in recent invaders fundamentally alters the fitness consequences of admixture. In native populations, selection against dilution of the locally adapted gene pool inhibits unconstrained admixture and reinforces population isolation, with some level of inbreeding depression as an expected consequence. We show that admixture is selected against despite significant inbreeding depression because the benefits of local adaptation are greater than the cost of inbreeding. In contrast, introduced populations that have not yet established a pattern of local adaptation can freely reap the benefits of admixture. There can be strong selection for admixture because it instantly lifts the inbreeding depression that had built up in isolated parental populations. Recent work in Silene suggests that reduced inbreeding depression associated with post-introduction admixture may contribute to enhanced fitness of invasive populations. We hypothesize that in locally adapted populations, the benefits of local adaptation are balanced against an inbreeding cost that could develop in part owing to the isolating effect of local adaptation itself. The inbreeding cost can be revealed in admixing populations during recent invasions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.