Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20684789›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2010

Physical activity interventions to improve daily walking activity in cancer survivors.

Ruud H Knols, Eling D de Bruin, Kei Shirato, Daniel Uebelhart, Neil K Aaronson

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Counseling interventions delivered in women with breast cancer to improve health-related quality of life: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Theory-based predictors of follow-up exercise behavior after a supervised exercise intervention in older breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2012
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Quality of life (QOL), supportive care, and spirituality in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colorectal cancer survivorship: movement matters.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruud H KnolsInstitute of Human Movement Sciences and Sport, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eling D de Bruin
Kei Shirato
Daniel Uebelhart
Neil K Aaronson
ETH Zurich · CHThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients may benefit from physical exercise programs. It is unclear, however, how sustained levels of physical activity are best achieved in this population. A systematic review was performed to summarize the current evidence of the effect of physical activity interventions on daily walking activity enhancement in cancer survivors, and to review the literature for its methodological quality.

methodsA search in Medline, PEDro and the Cochrane databases was performed for English literature citations (randomized controlled trials; 'RCTs'). In a first step, one reviewer abstracted data from the included studies on patients, physical activity interventions and outcomes. Two independent reviewers reviewed the methodological quality of these studies. Data were pooled using random-effects calculations.

resultsOur search identified 201 citations. Five RCTs that reported changes in daily step activity over time were identified, and were reviewed for methodological quality and substantive results. The median score across studies for methodological quality based on the PEDro criteria was 8. These 5 RCTs evaluated 660 participants with a mean age of 53.6 (SD 4.2) years. The mean change in daily step activity for patients with a physical exercise intervention was 526 daily steps (SD 537), with a range from -92 to 1299 daily steps. The data of three studies reporting the effect of combined physical activity and counseling on daily walking activity in breast cancer survivors were pooled, however; the I(2) was 79%, indicating statistical heterogeneity between the three trials.

conclusionThe 5 RCTs reviewed were of good methodological quality. Together they suggest that combined physical activity and counseling improves daily step activity in (breast) cancer survivors. Studies that define a step goal appear to be more effective in improving daily walking activity than studies that do not do so. However, the current results should be interpreted with caution because of the observed clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Future studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of goal targeted physical activity, with or without counseling, on daily walking in various cancer populations.

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyHealth PromotionWalkingHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvivors

Identifiers

PMID20684789
PMCPMC2921399
OpenAlexW2109045970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.