Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20684778›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2010

Rapid detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from positive blood cultures by quantitative PCR.

Vincent Cattoir, Audrey Gilibert, Jeanne-Marie Le Glaunec, Nathalie Launay, Lilia Bait-Mérabet, Patrick Legrand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Comparison of rapid BACpro® II, Sepsityper® kit and in-house preparation methods for direct identification of bacteria from blood cultures by MALDI-TOF MS with and without Sepsityper® module analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnosis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vincent CattoirLaboratoire de Bactériologie-Virologie-Hygiène, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France. cattoir-v@chu-caen.fr
Audrey Gilibert
Jeanne-Marie Le Glaunec
Nathalie Launay
Lilia Bait-Mérabet
Patrick Legrand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPseudomonas aeruginosa is responsible for numerous bloodstream infections associated with severe adverse outcomes in case of inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy. The present study was aimed to develop a novel quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, using ecfX as the specific target gene, for the rapid and accurate identification of P. aeruginosa from positive blood cultures (BCs).

methodsOver the period August 2008 to June 2009, 100 BC bottles positive for gram-negative bacilli were tested in order to evaluate performances of the qPCR technique with conventional methods as gold standard (i.e. culture and phenotypic identification).

resultsThirty-three strains of P. aeruginosa, 53 strains of Enterobactericaeae, nine strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and two other gram-negative species were isolated while 3 BCs were polymicrobial including one mixture containing P. aeruginosa. All P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were detected by qPCR except a single strain in mixed culture. Performances of the qPCR technique were: specificity, 100%; positive predictive value, 100%; negative predictive value, 98.5%; and sensitivity, 97%.

conclusionsThis reliable technique may offer a rapid (<1.5 h) tool that would help clinicians to initiate an appropriate treatment earlier. Further investigations are needed to assess the clinical benefit of this novel strategy as compared to phenotypic methods.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesBloodDNA, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeGram-Negative BacteriaHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonas aeruginosaPseudomonas InfectionsSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAStenotrophomonasDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20684778
PMCPMC2928764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.