Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20684689›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of infectious diseases2010

The cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination in Malawi.

Stephen A Berry, Benjamin Johns, Chuck Shih, Andrea A Berry, Damian G Walker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of the economic value of diarrheal vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2014
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cost-Effectiveness of Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccination of Infants in Malawi: A Postintroduction Analysis Using Individual Patient-Level Costing Data.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
  9. Cost-effectiveness of live oral attenuated human rotavirus vaccine in Tanzania.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephen A BerryJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, USA. sberry8@jhmi.edu
Benjamin Johns
Chuck Shih
Andrea A Berry
Damian G Walker

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (KL2)KL2RR025006 · NCRR · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2007 to 2011
$12.9M
Universal Screening of HIV-Infected Persons for Gonorrhea and ChlamydiaK23AI084854 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BERRY, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2010 to 2014
$671k
NCRR NIH HHS 1KL2RR025006-01NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025006NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI084854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRotarix (GlaxoSmithKline), a newly licensed rotavirus vaccine requiring 2 doses, may have the potential to save hundreds of thousands of lives in Africa. Nations such as Malawi, where Rotarix is currently under phase III investigation, may nevertheless face difficult economic choices in considering vaccine adoption.

methodsThe cost-effectiveness of implementing a Rotarix vaccine program in Malawi was estimated using published estimates of rotavirus burden, vaccine efficacy, and health care utilization and costs.

resultsWith 49.5% vaccine efficacy, a Rotarix program could avert 2582 deaths annually. With GAVI Alliance cofinancing, adoption of Rotarix would be associated with a cost of $5.07 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. With market pricing, Rotarix would be associated with a base case cost of $74.73 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Key variables influencing results were vaccine efficacy, under-2 rotavirus mortality, and program cost of administering each dose.

conclusionsAdopting Rotarix would likely be highly cost-effective for Malawi, particularly with GAVI support. This finding holds true across uncertainty ranges for key variables, including efficacy, for which data are becoming available.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision TreesHumansImmunization ProgramsImmunization ScheduleInfantInfant, NewbornMalawiRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesRotavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20684689
PMCPMC3962285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.