Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2010
The effect of pre- and probiotics on the colonic ammonia metabolism in humans as measured by lactose-[¹⁵N₂]ureide.
Trial report in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei LC01 positively modulates intestinal microflora in healthy young adults.Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea) · 2013Trial
- Effects of Probiotics and Wheat Bran Supplementation of Broiler Diets on the Ammonia Emission from Excreta.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Prebiotic Supplementation ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Biodiversity of Intestinal Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Healthy Population.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2016Review
- Effects of L-tryptophan, Fructan, and Casein on Reducing Ammonia, Hydrogen Sulfide, and Skatole in Fermented Swine Manure.Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences · 2015Article
- Towards microbial fermentation metabolites as markers for health benefits of prebiotics.Nutrition research reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe evaluation of ammonia detoxification by pre- and probiotics by means of colonic lactose-[(15)N(2)]ureide ((15)N-LU) degradation is of great interest both scientifically and in terms of nutrition physiology.
objectivePre- and probiotics were supplemented in healthy adults to evaluate the effect of the ammonia metabolism in the human colon by means of (15)N-LU.
methodsA total of 14 participants aged 20-28 years daily received a regular diet either without (no treatment) or with supplementation of 30 g fibre of potatoes (FPs), 30 g wrinkle pea starch (WPS, resistant starch content: 12 and 70%, respectively) and 375 g Lactobacillus acidophilus (LC1) yoghurt, over a 10-day period in a randomised order. After 1 week, 5.7 mg/kg body weight (15)N-LU was administered together with breakfast. A venous blood sample was taken after 6 h. Urine and faeces were collected over a period of 48 and 72 h, respectively. The (15)N abundances were measured by isotope ratio mass spectrometry.
resultsThe mean renal (15)N-excretion differed significantly between the supplementation of FP and no treatment (32.5 versus 46.3%, P=0.034), FP and LC1 (32.5 versus 51.6%, P=0.001), and WPS and LC1 (38.5 versus 51.6%, P=0.048). The mean faecal (15)N-excretion amounted to 42.7% (no treatment), 59.7% (FP), 41.8% (WPS) and 44.0% (LC1). In comparison with no treatment, the urinary (15)NH(3)-enrichment was significantly decreased at 16 h after FP supplementation.
conclusionThe prebiotic intake of FP and WPS lowered the colonic generation and the renal excretion of toxic (15)NH(3), respectively, when using (15)N-LU as a xenobiotic marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.