Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20683094›Full record

Trial reportJournal of physical activity & health2010

Results of a randomized trial testing messages tailored to participant-selected topics among female college students: physical activity outcomes.

Lisa M Quintiliani, Marci K Campbell, J Michael Bowling, Susan Steck, Pamela S Haines, Brenda M DeVellis

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of physical activity & health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Get the message? A scoping review of physical activity messaging.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa M QuintilianiDept of General Internal Medicine, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Marci K Campbell
J Michael Bowling
Susan Steck
Pamela S Haines
Brenda M DeVellis

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Venkata Saroja Voruganti · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
LINEBERGER CANCER CONTROL EDUCATION PROGRAMR25CA057726 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI EARP, JO ANNE L, RIBISL, KURT M. · 1992 to 2016
$8.0M
NUTRITIONAL BIOCHEMISTRY AND EPIDEMIOLOGY OF CANCERT32CA072319 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ZEISEL, STEVEN H · 1997 to 2006
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA72319NCI NIH HHS R25 CA057726NCI NIH HHS T32 CA072319NIDDK NIH HHS DK56350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA better understanding of identifying tailoring variables would improve message design. Tailoring to a behavior that a participant selects as one they would like to work on may increase message relevance, and thus effectiveness. This trial compared 3 groups: message tailored to physical activity as a participant-selected topic (choice), message tailored to physical activity as an expert-determined topic (expert), or nontailored message (comparison).

methods408 female college students received web-delivered computer-tailored messages on physical activity. Outcomes were immediate and 1-month follow-up changes in psychosocial, goal-related, and behavioral variables related to physical activity.

resultsParticipants were predominately non-Hispanic White (73.8%). Change in self-efficacy and goal commitment at immediate follow-up and vigorous physical activity at 1-month follow-up was greater in the expert versus comparison group. Change in goal commitment at immediate follow-up was lower in the choice versus expert group. In the expert group, those choosing physical activity as their selected topic perceived the goal to be easier at immediate follow-up compared with those receiving unmatched messages.

conclusionsFindings supported tailoring to an expert-determined topic. However, based on the beneficial change in perceived goal difficulty when topics matched, future research should encourage synchrony between participant-selected topics and expert recommendations.

Indexed as

Electronic MailHealth BehaviorIntentionAdolescentAdultExerciseFemaleGoalsHealth PromotionHumansSelf EfficacyStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20683094
PMCPMC4862359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.