Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20682881›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2010

Efficacy of miltefosine for the treatment of American cutaneous leishmaniasis.

Iván Vélez, Liliana López, Ximena Sánchez, Laureano Mestra, Carlos Rojas, Erwin Rodríguez

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04072874 phase1 / phase2withdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Safety and Clinical Activity of Curaleish Lotion and Cream in the Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled0ConditionsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousArmsExperimental topical (Curaleish Topical)
NCT05094908 phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Therapeutic Response of Two ARNICA TINCTURE Treatment Regimes in the Topical Treatment of Uncomplicated Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Colombia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled16ConditionsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousArmsArnica Tincture
NCT06822478 phase3recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Blinded Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Arnica Tincture in the Topical Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de AntioquiaRan2026 to 2030Enrolled96ConditionsLeishmaniasis, CutaneousArmsArnica Tincture, Meglumine antimoniate.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for American cutaneous and mucocutaneous leishmaniasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. A novel inhibitory strategy ofFuture microbiology · 2025
    Article
  15. Molecular Mechanisms of Drug Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iván VélezUniversidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia. idvelez@pecet-colombia.org
Liliana López
Ximena Sánchez
Laureano Mestra
Carlos Rojas
Erwin Rodríguez
Universidad de Antioquia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Miltefosine is an oral agent used for cutaneous leishmaniasis treatment. An open-label, randomized, phase III clinical trial was carried out in the Colombian army population. Miltefosine, 50 mg capsule was taken orally three times per day for 28 days (N = 145) or meglumine antimoniate, 20 mg/kg body weight per day for 20 days by intramuscular injection (N = 143). The efficacy of miltefosine by protocol was 69.8% (85/122 patients) and 58.6% (85/145 patients) by intention to treat. For meglumine antimoniate, the efficacy by protocol was 85.1% (103/121 patients) and 72% (103/143 patients) by intention to treat. No association was found between drug efficacy and L. (V.) braziliensis or L. (V.) panamensis species of Leishmania responsible for infection. Adverse gastrointestinal events were associated with the use of miltefosine, the meglumine antimoniate treatment was associated with adverse effects on the skeletal musculature, fever, cephalea, and higher toxicity in kidney, liver, pancreas, and hematological system.

Indexed as

AdultAntiprotozoal AgentsCapsulesHumansInjections, IntramuscularLeishmaniaLeishmaniasis, CutaneousMaleMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniateMilitary PersonnelOrganometallic CompoundsPhosphorylcholineYoung AdultAntiprotozoal AgentsCapsulesMeglumineMeglumine AntimoniatemiltefosineOrganometallic CompoundsPhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID20682881
PMCPMC2911184
OpenAlexW2104134989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.