Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20682778›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2010

Direct binding of the EGF-like domain of neuregulin-1 to integrins ({alpha}v{beta}3 and {alpha}6{beta}4) is involved in neuregulin-1/ErbB signaling.

Katsuaki Ieguchi, Masaaki Fujita, Zi Ma, Parastoo Davari, Yukimasa Taniguchi, Kiyotoshi Sekiguchi, Bobby Wang, Yoko K Takada, Yoshikazu Takada

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katsuaki IeguchiDepartment of Dermatology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.
Masaaki Fujita
Zi Ma
Parastoo Davari
Yukimasa Taniguchi
Kiyotoshi Sekiguchi
Bobby Wang
Yoko K Takada
Yoshikazu Takada
University of California, Davis · USProtein Research Foundation · JP

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
Targeting Agents for Human and Canine LymphomaU19CA113298 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI LAM, KIT S · 2005 to 2009
$5.4M
Potential of a dominant-negative FGF mutant as a therapeutic in cancerR01CA131015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI TAKADA, YOSHIKAZU · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA093373NCI NIH HHS CA113298NCI NIH HHS CA131015NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131015NCI NIH HHS U19 CA113298
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrin-growth factor receptor cross-talk plays a role in growth factor signaling, but the specifics are unclear. In a current model, integrins and growth factor receptors independently bind to their ligands (extracellular matrix and growth factors, respectively). We discovered that neuregulin-1 (NRG1), either as an isolated EGF-like domain or as a native multi-domain form, binds to integrins αvβ3 (with a K(D) of 1.36 × 10(-7) m) and α6β4. Docking simulation predicted that three Lys residues at positions 180, 184, and 186 of the EGF-like domain are involved in integrin binding. Mutating these residues to Glu individually or in combination markedly suppressed integrin binding and ErbB3 phosphorylation. Mutating all three Lys residues to Glu (the 3KE mutation) did not affect the ability of NRG1 to bind to ErbB3 but markedly reduced the ability of NRG1 to induce ErbB3 phosphorylation and AKT and Erk1/2 activation in MCF-7 and T47D human breast cancer cells. This suggests that direct integrin binding to NRG1 is critical for NRG1/ErbB signaling. Notably, stimulation of cells with WT NRG1 induced co-precipitation of ErbB3 with α6β4 and with αvβ3 to a much lower extent. This suggests that WT NRG1 induces integrin-NRG1-ErbB3 ternary complex formation. In contrast, the 3KE mutant was much less effective in inducing ternary complex formation than WT NRG1, suggesting that this process depends on the ability of NRG1 to bind to integrins. These results suggest that direct NRG1-integrin interaction mediates integrin-ErbB cross-talk and that α6β4 plays a major role in NRG-ErbB signaling in these cancer cells.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusHumansIntegrin alphaVbeta3K562 CellsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Mutation, MissenseNeuregulin-1PhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Structure, QuaternaryIntegrin alphaVbeta3MAPK1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Neuregulin-1NRG1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptor, ErbB-3

Identifiers

PMID20682778
PMCPMC2951213
OpenAlexW2058024663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.