Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20682266›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Revisiting the association of cationic groove-binding drugs to DNA using a Poisson-Boltzmann approach.

Marcia O Fenley, Robert C Harris, B Jayaram, Alexander H Boschitsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Problems of robustness in Poisson-Boltzmann binding free energies.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Direct measurement of the dielectric polarization properties of DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcia O FenleyDepartment of Physics and Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA. mfenley@sb.fsu.edu
Robert C Harris
B Jayaram
Alexander H Boschitsch
Florida State University · USContinuum Dynamics (United States) · USIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · IN

Funding

Refinement of Macromolecular Assembly Structure using Electron MicroscopyR01GM078538 · NIGMS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAPMAN, MICHAEL S. · 2007 to 2010
$1.1M
Numerical Methods that Solve the PBE for Biomolecular ElectrostaticsR43GM079056 · NIGMS · CONTINUUM DYNAMICS, INC. · PI BOSCHITSCH, ALEXANDER H · 2007 to 2007
$100k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R43GM079056NIGMS NIH HHS GM078538-01NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078538NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM079056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proper modeling of nonspecific salt-mediated electrostatic interactions is essential to understanding the binding of charged ligands to nucleic acids. Because the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE) and the more approximate generalized Born approach are applied routinely to nucleic acids and their interactions with charged ligands, the reliability of these methods is examined vis-à-vis an efficient nonlinear PBE method. For moderate salt concentrations, the negative derivative, SK(pred), of the electrostatic binding free energy, DeltaG(el), with respect to the logarithm of the 1:1 salt concentration, [M(+)], for 33 cationic minor groove drugs binding to AT-rich DNA sequences is shown to be consistently negative and virtually constant over the salt range considered (0.1-0.4 M NaCl). The magnitude of SK(pred) is approximately equal to the charge on the drug, as predicted by counterion condensation theory (CCT) and observed in thermodynamic binding studies. The linear PBE is shown to overestimate the magnitude of SK(pred), whereas the nonlinear PBE closely matches the experimental results. The PBE predictions of SK(pred) were not correlated with DeltaG(el) in the presence of a dielectric discontinuity, as would be expected from the CCT. Because this correlation does not hold, parameterizing the PBE predictions of DeltaG(el) against the reported experimental data is not possible. Moreover, the common practice of extracting the electrostatic and nonelectrostatic contributions to the binding of charged ligands to biopolyelectrolytes based on the simple relation between experimental SK values and the electrostatic binding free energy that is based on CCT is called into question by the results presented here. Although the rigid-docking nonlinear PB calculations provide reliable predictions of SK(pred), at least for the charged ligand-nucleic acid complexes studied here, accurate estimates of DeltaG(el) will require further development in theoretical and experimental approaches.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalNucleic Acid ConformationCationsDNANonlinear DynamicsPharmaceutical PreparationsPoisson DistributionSaltsStatic ElectricityThermodynamicsCationsDNAPharmaceutical PreparationsSalts

Identifiers

PMID20682266
PMCPMC2913177
OpenAlexW2002888567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.