ArticleBiophysical journal2010
Revisiting the association of cationic groove-binding drugs to DNA using a Poisson-Boltzmann approach.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Studies of an RNA Duplex Electrostatics by Ion Counting.Biophysical journal · 2019Article
- Physicochemical Properties of Ion Pairs of Biological Macromolecules.Biomolecules · 2015Review
- Problems of robustness in Poisson-Boltzmann binding free energies.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2015Article
- Features of CPB: a Poisson-Boltzmann solver that uses an adaptive Cartesian grid.Journal of computational chemistry · 2015Article
- Excluded volume and ion-ion correlation effects on the ionic atmosphere around B-DNA: theory, simulations, and experiments.The Journal of chemical physics · 2014Article
- Direct measurement of the dielectric polarization properties of DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014Article
- Sensitivities to parameterization in the size-modified Poisson-Boltzmann equation.The Journal of chemical physics · 2014Article
- Influence of Grid Spacing in Poisson-Boltzmann Equation Binding Energy Estimation.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2013Article
- Structural and energetic insights into sequence-specific interaction in DNA-drug recognition: development of affinity predictor and analysis of binding selectivity.Journal of molecular modeling · 2013Article
- A Fast and Robust Poisson-Boltzmann Solver Based on Adaptive Cartesian Grids.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Proper modeling of nonspecific salt-mediated electrostatic interactions is essential to understanding the binding of charged ligands to nucleic acids. Because the linear Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE) and the more approximate generalized Born approach are applied routinely to nucleic acids and their interactions with charged ligands, the reliability of these methods is examined vis-à-vis an efficient nonlinear PBE method. For moderate salt concentrations, the negative derivative, SK(pred), of the electrostatic binding free energy, DeltaG(el), with respect to the logarithm of the 1:1 salt concentration, [M(+)], for 33 cationic minor groove drugs binding to AT-rich DNA sequences is shown to be consistently negative and virtually constant over the salt range considered (0.1-0.4 M NaCl). The magnitude of SK(pred) is approximately equal to the charge on the drug, as predicted by counterion condensation theory (CCT) and observed in thermodynamic binding studies. The linear PBE is shown to overestimate the magnitude of SK(pred), whereas the nonlinear PBE closely matches the experimental results. The PBE predictions of SK(pred) were not correlated with DeltaG(el) in the presence of a dielectric discontinuity, as would be expected from the CCT. Because this correlation does not hold, parameterizing the PBE predictions of DeltaG(el) against the reported experimental data is not possible. Moreover, the common practice of extracting the electrostatic and nonelectrostatic contributions to the binding of charged ligands to biopolyelectrolytes based on the simple relation between experimental SK values and the electrostatic binding free energy that is based on CCT is called into question by the results presented here. Although the rigid-docking nonlinear PB calculations provide reliable predictions of SK(pred), at least for the charged ligand-nucleic acid complexes studied here, accurate estimates of DeltaG(el) will require further development in theoretical and experimental approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.