Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20682251›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Distribution of electromechanical delay in the heart: insights from a three-dimensional electromechanical model.

V Gurev, J Constantino, J J Rice, N A Trayanova

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Electromechanical wave imaging vs electrocardiographic imaging: a direct comparison of non-invasive ventricular activation mapping modalities.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. 4D cardiac electromechanical activation imaging.Computers in biology and medicine · 2019
    Article
  19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Contracting Ultrathin Cardiac Tissue.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V GurevDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Constantino
J J Rice
N A Trayanova
Johns Hopkins University · USIBM (United States) · US

Funding

Defibrillation Mechanisms in Infarcted HeartsR01HL082729 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI TRAYANOVA, NATALIA A. · 2007 to 2010
$2.1M
Noninvasive conduction mapping using Electromechanical Wave ImagingR21HL096094 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2009 to 2010
$446k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL082729NHLBI NIH HHS HL096094NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL082729NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL096094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the intact heart, the distribution of electromechanical delay (EMD), the time interval between local depolarization and myocyte shortening onset, depends on the loading conditions. The distribution of EMD throughout the heart remains, however, unknown because current experimental techniques are unable to evaluate three-dimensional cardiac electromechanical behavior. The goal of this study was to determine the three-dimensional EMD distributions in the intact ventricles for sinus rhythm (SR) and epicardial pacing (EP) by using a new, to our knowledge, electromechanical model of the rabbit ventricles that incorporates a biophysical representation of myofilament dynamics. Furthermore, we aimed to ascertain the mechanisms that underlie the specific three-dimensional EMD distributions. The results revealed that under both conditions, the three-dimensional EMD distribution is nonuniform. During SR, EMD is longer at the epicardium than at the endocardium, and is greater near the base than at the apex. After EP, the three-dimensional EMD distribution is markedly different; it also changes with the pacing rate. For both SR and EP, late-depolarized regions were characterized with significant myofiber prestretch caused by the contraction of the early-depolarized regions. This prestretch delays myofiber-shortening onset, and results in a longer EMD, giving rise to heterogeneous three-dimensional EMD distributions.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCardiac Pacing, ArtificialElectrophysiological PhenomenaEndocardiumHeartKineticsPericardiumRabbitsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID20682251
PMCPMC2913183
OpenAlexW2083132667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.