Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20682246›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2010

Shaping a morphogen gradient for positional precision.

Feng He, Timothy E Saunders, Ying Wen, David Cheung, Renjie Jiao, Pieter Rein ten Wolde, Martin Howard, Jun Ma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The many bits of positional information.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms and Measurements of Scale Invariance of Morphogen Gradients.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Feng HeDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Timothy E Saunders
Ying Wen
David Cheung
Renjie Jiao
Pieter Rein ten Wolde
Martin Howard
Jun Ma
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USJohn Innes Centre · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute for Atomic and Molecular Physics · NLInstitute of Biophysics · CN

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C519670/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000C0637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Morphogen gradients, which provide positional information to cells in a developing tissue, could in principle adopt any nonuniform profile. To our knowledge, how the profile of a morphogen gradient affects positional precision has not been well studied experimentally. Here, we compare the positional precision provided by the Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid (Bcd) in wild-type (wt) embryos with embryos lacking an interacting cofactor. The Bcd gradient in the latter case exhibits decreased positional precision around mid-embryo compared with its wt counterpart. The domain boundary of Hunchback (Hb), a target activated by Bcd, becomes more variable in mutant embryos. By considering embryo-to-embryo, internal, and measurement fluctuations, we dissect mathematically the relevant sources of fluctuations that contribute to the error in positional information. Using this approach, we show that the defect in Hb boundary positioning in mutant embryos is directly reflective of an altered Bcd gradient profile with increasing flatness toward mid-embryo. Furthermore, we find that noise in the Bcd input signal is dominated by internal fluctuations but, due to time and spatial averaging, the spatial precision of the Hb boundary is primarily affected by embryo-to-embryo variations. Our results demonstrate that the positional information provided by the wt Bcd gradient profile is highly precise and necessary for patterning precision.

Indexed as

Body PatterningAnimalsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEmbryo, NonmammalianHomeodomain ProteinsModels, BiologicalMutationp300-CBP Transcription FactorsTime FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription FactorsTranscription, Geneticbcd protein, DrosophilaDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinshb protein, DrosophilaHomeodomain Proteinsnej protein, Drosophilaoc protein, Drosophilap300-CBP Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID20682246
PMCPMC2913175
OpenAlexW2096417591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.