ReviewScience progress2010
Development and regeneration of projection neuron subtypes of the cerebral cortex.
Review in Science progress, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prenatal interleukin 6 elevation increases glutamatergic synapse density and disrupts hippocampal connectivity in offspring.Immunity · 2021Article
- Multi-omics insights into neuronal regeneration and re-innervation.Neural regeneration research · 2021Article
- Absence of Subcerebral Projection Neurons Is Beneficial in a Mouse Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.Annals of neurology · 2020Article
- Multi-Omic Analyses of Growth Cones at Different Developmental Stages Provides Insight into Pathways in Adult Neuroregeneration.iScience · 2020Article
- Article
- How big is the myelinating orchestra? Cellular diversity within the oligodendrocyte lineage: facts and hypotheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014Review
- Production and organization of neocortical interneurons.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The idea of repairing damaged neuronal circuitry in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) has challenged neuroscientists for centuries. This is mainly due to the notorious inability of neurons to regenerate and the unparalleled cellular diversity of the nervous system. In the mammalian cerebral cortex, one of the most complex areas of the CNS, multipotent neural stem and progenitor cells undergo progressive specification during development to generate the staggering variety of projection neuron subtypes that are found in the adult. How is this process orchestrated in the embryo? And, can developmental signals be used to regenerate projection neuron subtypes in the adult or in the dish? Here, we first provide an overview of the diversity and fate potential of neural progenitors of the cerebral cortex during development. Further, we discuss the plasticity of neural progenitors and the roles of intrinsic and extrinsic signals over progenitor fate. Finally, we discuss the relevance of developmental signals for efforts to direct the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells into specific types of cortical projection neurons for therapeutic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.