Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20680649›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2010

Towards improving the safety and diagnostic yield of stereotactic biopsy in a single centre.

Ruben Dammers, Joost W Schouten, Iain K Haitsma, Arnaud J P E Vincent, Johan M Kros, Clemens M F Dirven

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Towards Optical Biopsy in Glioma Surgery.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Launching Stealth AutoGuideFrontiers in robotics and AI · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Stereotactic biopsy for lesions in brainstem and deep brain: a single-center experience of 72 cases.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ruben DammersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. r.dammers@erasmusmc.nl
Joost W Schouten
Iain K Haitsma
Arnaud J P E Vincent
Johan M Kros
Clemens M F Dirven

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreviously, we reported on our single centre results regarding the diagnostic yield of stereotactic needle biopsies of brain lesions. The yield then (1996-2006) was 89.4%. In the present study, we review and evaluate our experience with intraoperative frozen-section histopathologic diagnosis on-demand in order to improve the diagnostic yield.

methodsOne hundred sixty-four consecutive frameless biopsy procedures in 160 patients (group 1, 2006-2010) were compared with the historic control group (group 2, n = 164 frameless biopsy procedures). Diagnostic yield, as well as demographics, morbidity and mortality, was compared. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, Chi-square test and backward logistic regression when appropriate.

resultsDemographics were comparable. In group 1, a non-diagnostic tissue specimen was obtained in 1.8%, compared to 11.0% in group 2 (p = 0.001). Also, both the operating time and the number of biopsies needed were decreased significantly. Procedure-related mortality decreased from 3.7% to 0.6% (p = 0.121). Multivariate analysis only proved operating time (odds ratio (OR), 1.012; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.000-1.025; p = 0.043), a right-sided lesion (OR, 3.183; 95% CI, 1.217-8.322; p = 0.018) and on-demand intraoperative histology (OR, 0.175; 95% CI, 0.050-0.618; p = 0.007) important factors predicting non-diagnostic biopsies.

conclusionsThe importance of a reliable pathological diagnosis as obtained by biopsy must not be underestimated. We believe that when performing stereotactic biopsy for intracranial lesions, next to minimising morbidity, one should strive for as high a positive yield as possible. In the present single centre retrospective series, we have shown that using a standardised procedure and careful on-demand intraoperative frozen-section analysis can improve the diagnostic yield of stereotactic brain biopsy procedures as compared to a historical series.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiopsy, NeedleBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStereotaxic Techniques

Identifiers

PMID20680649
PMCPMC2956059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.