ArticleFolia microbiologica2010
Extracellular complex of chitinolytic enzymes of Clostridium paraputrificum strain J4 separated by membrane ultrafiltration.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membrane diafiltration was used for separation of the extracellular complex of chitinolytic enzymes of C. paraputrificum J4 free from contaminants with molar mass higher than 100 kDa and lower than 30 kDa. The enzyme complex containing beta-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAGase) and six endochitinases was concentrated on a membrane with cut-off 30 kDa. In this retentate, the NAGase/endochitinase specific activity was 13.5/6.5-times higher than in the initial culture filtrate. The proportion (in%) of endochitinases: 23 (90 kDa), 42 (86 kDa), 8 (72 kDa), 16 (68 kDa) and 8 (60 kDa) was calculated from their peak areas (determined by densitometry) in images of zymograms. NAGase (38 kDa) was less active and stable at pH lower than 4 and higher than 8 but it was more temperature-stable than endochitinases, especially at 40-60 degrees C. In contrast to endochitinases, the pH optimum of NAGase activity was shifted by ca. 0.7 pH units to the alkaline region. Extracellular NAGase together with six endochitinases secreted by C. paraputrificum J4 were separated by membrane diafiltration and characterized by molar mass, stability and activity in dependence on pH and temperature. The knowledge of composition of chitinolytic enzymes, their pH and temperature stability is useful for optimization of the separation process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.