Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20679587›Full record

Trial reportArchives of general psychiatry2010

A randomized add-on trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist in treatment-resistant bipolar depression.

Nancy Diazgranados, Lobna Ibrahim, Nancy E Brutsche, Andrew Newberg, Phillip Kronstein, Sami Khalife, William A Kammerer, Zenaide Quezado, David A Luckenbaugh, Giacomo Salvadore and 3 more

5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of general psychiatry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 426 papers, 20 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
426citing papers in PubMed, 20 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01179009 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2012, after this paper: background citation

A Safe Ketamine-Based Therapy for Treatment Resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2012 to 2015Enrolled20ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantArmsKetamine, Clonidine, placebo
NCT01441505 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

A Study of Ketamine as an Antidepressant

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of New South WalesRan2011 to 2014Enrolled42ConditionsMajor Depressive EpisodeArmsKetamine, Saline or Midazolam (active placebo)
NCT01935115 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective Randomized Double Blinded Control Trial Using Ketamine or Propofol Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Improving Treatment-Resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of SaskatchewanRan2013 to 2016Enrolled27ConditionsTreatment Resistant DepressionArmsPropofol, Ketamine
NCT02610712 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Trial of the Use of Ketamine in Treatment Resistant Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, MexicoRan2014Enrolled20ConditionsDepressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantArmsKetamine
NCT03742557 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Schemes of Administration of Intravenous Ketamine in Treatment-resistant Depression: Clinical-neuroimaging Correlation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, MexicoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled30ConditionsTreatment Resistant DepressionArmsKetamine 50 MG/ML Injectable Solution, 0.5 mg/kg IV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

426 citing papers in PubMed, 20 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Ketamine treatment for refractory anxiety: A systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Ketamine for Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

366 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nancy DiazgranadosExperimental Therapeutics, Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lobna Ibrahim
Nancy E Brutsche
Andrew Newberg
Phillip Kronstein
Sami Khalife
William A Kammerer
Zenaide Quezado
David A Luckenbaugh
Giacomo Salvadore
Rodrigo Machado-Vieira
Husseini K Manji
Carlos A Zarate

Funding

Glutamatergic Modulators for Rapid & Sustained Antidepressant EffectZIAMH002857 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI ZARATE, CARLOS · 2009 to 2025
$55.0M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextExisting therapies for bipolar depression have a considerable lag of onset of action. Pharmacological strategies that produce rapid antidepressant effects-for instance, within a few hours or days-would have an enormous impact on patient care and public health.

objectiveTo determine whether an N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonist produces rapid antidepressant effects in subjects with bipolar depression.

designA randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover, add-on study conducted from October 2006 to June 2009.

settingMood Disorders Research Unit at the National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Patients Eighteen subjects with DSM-IV bipolar depression (treatment-resistant).

interventionsSubjects maintained at therapeutic levels of lithium or valproate received an intravenous infusion of either ketamine hydrochloride (0.5 mg/kg) or placebo on 2 test days 2 weeks apart. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale was used to rate subjects at baseline and at 40, 80, 110, and 230 minutes and on days 1, 2, 3, 7, 10, and 14 postinfusion.

main outcome measuresChange in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale primary efficacy measure scores.

resultsWithin 40 minutes, depressive symptoms significantly improved in subjects receiving ketamine compared with placebo (d = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.76); this improvement remained significant through day 3. The drug difference effect size was largest at day 2 (d = 0.80, 95% CI, 0.55-1.04). Seventy-one percent of subjects responded to ketamine and 6% responded to placebo at some point during the trial. One subject receiving ketamine and 1 receiving placebo developed manic symptoms. Ketamine was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse effect was dissociative symptoms, only at the 40-minute point.

conclusionIn patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression, robust and rapid antidepressant effects resulted from a single intravenous dose of an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBipolar DisorderDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersDouble-Blind MethodDrug ResistanceDrug Therapy, CombinationExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleHumansKetamineLithium CompoundsMaleMiddle AgedN-MethylaspartateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsKetamineLithium CompoundsN-MethylaspartatePlacebosValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID20679587
PMCPMC3000408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.