Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20679439›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2010

Mucosal immunization with Vibrio cholerae outer membrane vesicles provides maternal protection mediated by antilipopolysaccharide antibodies that inhibit bacterial motility.

Anne L Bishop, Stefan Schild, Bharathi Patimalla, Brian Klein, Andrew Camilli

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Outer membrane vesicles inMicrobial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dynamics of IgM and IgA Antibody Response Profile AgainstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Platforms.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Vibrio Polar Flagellum: Structure and Regulation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  12. Frontiers in medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. The Tip ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  14. Impact of Gene Repression on Biofilm Formation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Systemic, Mucosal, and Memory Immune Responses following Cholera.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne L BishopDepartment of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Stefan Schild
Bharathi Patimalla
Brian Klein
Andrew Camilli
Tufts University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Graz · AT

Funding

Study of transmissible forms of Vibrio CholeraeR01AI055058 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI CAMILLI, ANDREW · 2003 to 2019
$5.8M
Phage Resistance in Emergent Vibrio cholerae and Phage Prophylaxis of CholeraR37AI055058 · NIAID · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI Andrew Camilli · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS AI055058NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI055058NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI055058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae is the causative agent of cholera, a severe diarrheal disease that remains endemic in many parts of the world and can cause outbreaks wherever sanitation and clean water systems break down. Prevention of disease could be achieved through improved sanitation and clean water provision supported by vaccination. V. cholerae serogroup O1 is the major cause of cholera; O1 serotypes Inaba and Ogawa have similar disease burdens, while O139 is the only non-O1 serogroup to cause epidemics. We showed previously that immunization of adult female mice with purified V. cholerae outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) elicits an antibody response that protect neonates from oral V. cholerae challenge and that suckling from an immunized dam accounts for the majority of protection from V. cholerae colonization. Here we report that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the major OMV protective antigen. Mucosal immunization with OMVs from Inaba or Ogawa provides significant cross-serotype protection from V. cholerae colonization, although serotype-specific antigens are dominant. OMVs from O1 or O139 do not provide cross-serogroup protection, but by immunization with a mixture of O1 and O139 OMVs, cross-serogroup protection was achieved. Neonatal protection is not associated with significant bacterial death but may involve inhibition of motility, as antibodies from OMV-immunized mice inhibit V. cholerae motility in vitro, with trends that parallel in vivo protection. Motility assays also reveal that a higher antibody titer is required to immobilize O139 compared to O1, a phenotype that is O139 capsule dependent.

Indexed as

Immunity, Maternally-AcquiredAdministration, IntranasalAdministration, OralAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, BacterialCell MembraneCholeraCholera VaccinesFemaleImmunoglobulinsMiceMilkSecretory VesiclesVibrio choleraeAntibodies, BacterialAntigens, Bacterialantilipopolysaccharide antibodiesCholera VaccinesImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID20679439
PMCPMC2950341
OpenAlexW2145536472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.