ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011
Characterizing the native codon usages of a genome: an axis projection approach.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolutionary Pathways and Trajectories in Antibiotic Resistance.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2021Article
- Article
- Using Machine Learning To Predict Antimicrobial MICs and Associated Genomic Features for NontyphoidalJournal of clinical microbiology · 2019Article
- Experimental characterization of two archaeal inosine 5'-monophosphate cyclohydrolases.PloS one · 2019Article
- Abundant toxin-related genes in the genomes of beneficial symbionts from deep-sea hydrothermal vent mussels.eLife · 2015Article
- Article
- Comparative genomic analysis reveals 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complex lipoylation correlation with aerobiosis in archaea.PloS one · 2014Article
- Article
- Genomes of the class Erysipelotrichia clarify the firmicute origin of the class Mollicutes.International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2013Article
- scnRCA: a novel method to detect consistent patterns of translational selection in mutationally-biased genomes.PloS one · 2013Article
- Codon usage methods for horizontal gene transfer detection generate an abundance of false positive and false negative results.Current microbiology · 2012Article
- Codon Deviation Coefficient: a novel measure for estimating codon usage bias and its statistical significance.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Purine biosynthesis in archaea: variations on a theme.Biology direct · 2011Article
- Similarity of genes horizontally acquired by Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica is evidence of a supraspecies pangenome.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Draft genome sequence of Bacteroides vulgatus PC510, a strain isolated from human feces.Journal of bacteriology · 2011Article
- Comparative genomics of Gardnerella vaginalis strains reveals substantial differences in metabolic and virulence potential.PloS one · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Codon usage can provide insights into the nature of the genes in a genome. Genes that are "native" to a genome (have not been recently acquired by horizontal transfer) range in codon usage from a low-bias "typical" usage to a more biased "high-expression" usage characteristic of genes encoding abundant proteins. Genes that differ from these native codon usages are candidates for foreign genes that have been recently acquired by horizontal gene transfer. In this study, we present a method for characterizing the codon usages of native genes--both typical and highly expressed--within a genome. Each gene is evaluated relative to a half line (or axis) in a 59D space of codon usage. The axis begins at the modal codon usage, the usage that matches the largest number of genes in the genome, and it passes through a point representing the codon usage of a set of genes with expression-related bias. A gene whose codon usage matches (does not significantly differ from) a point on this axis is a candidate native gene, and the location of its projection onto the axis provides a general estimate of its expression level. A gene that differs significantly from all points on the axis is a candidate foreign gene. This automated approach offers significant improvements over existing methods. We illustrate this by analyzing the genomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Bacillus anthracis A0248, which can be difficult to analyze with commonly used methods due to their biased base compositions. Finally, we use this approach to measure the proportion of candidate foreign genes in 923 bacterial and archaeal genomes. The organisms with the most homogeneous genomes (containing the fewest candidate foreign genes) are mostly endosymbionts and parasites, though with exceptions that include Pelagibacter ubique and Beutenbergia cavernae. The organisms with the most heterogeneous genomes (containing the most candidate foreign genes) include members of the genera Bacteroides, Corynebacterium, Desulfotalea, Neisseria, Xylella, and Thermobaculum.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.