Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20678673›Full record

Trial reportClinical therapeutics2010

Effectiveness and tolerability of high-dose (23 mg/d) versus standard-dose (10 mg/d) donepezil in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease: A 24-week, randomized, double-blind study.

Martin R Farlow, Stephen Salloway, Pierre N Tariot, Jane Yardley, Margaret L Moline, Qin Wang, Elimor Brand-Schieber, Heng Zou, Timothy Hsu, Andrew Satlin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical therapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00478205 (Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Comparison of 23 mg Donepezil Sustained Release), which is not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00478205 phase3completednot on this map

Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Comparison of 23 mg Donepezil Sustained Release (SR) to 10 mg Donepezil Immediate Release (IR) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Alzheimer's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorEisai Inc.Ran2007Enrolled1,467ConditionsAlzheimer's DiseaseArmsAricept (donepezil SR 23 mg), Aricept (donepezil IR 10 mg)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Donepezil for dementia due to Alzheimer's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Donepezil Plus Solifenacin (CPC-201) Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Cognitive Results of CANTAB Tests and Their Change Due to the First Dose of Donepezil May Predict Treatment Efficacy in Alzheimer Disease.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin R FarlowDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, 46202, USA. mfarlow@iupui.edu
Stephen Salloway
Pierre N Tariot
Jane Yardley
Margaret L Moline
Qin Wang
Elimor Brand-Schieber
Heng Zou
Timothy Hsu
Andrew Satlin
Eisai (Japan) · JPEisai (United States) · USBrown University · USEisai (United Kingdom) · GBIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative - SupplementU01AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE RES &EDUC · PI WEINER, MICHAEL W · 2004 to 2015
$121.0M
Research Education ComponentP30AG010133 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SAYKIN, ANDREW J · 1991 to 2020
$37.3M
Imaging CoreU01AG032438 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BATEMAN, RANDALL J · 2008 to 2009
$6.1M
Regulation of APP Pathway Gene Promoters in Alzheimer'sR01AG018379 · NIA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI LAHIRI, DEBOMOY K · 2000 to 2011
$3.1M
Aging Brain: DTI, Subcortical Ischemia and BehavioralR03AG023916 · NIA · BUTLER HOSPITAL (PROVIDENCE, RI) · PI SALLOWAY, STEPHEN P · 2005 to 2006
$118k
NIA NIH HHS 1 R03 AG023916-01A1NIA NIH HHS 1U01AG032438-01NIA NIH HHS AG18379NIA NIH HHS P30 AG010133NIA NIH HHS P30-AG10133NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018379NIA NIH HHS R03 AG023916NIA NIH HHS U01 AG 024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG024904NIA NIH HHS U01 AG032438NIA NIH HHS U24 AG026385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently approved Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatments have been reported to provide symptomatic benefit, without proven impact on clinical progression. We hypothesized that the loss of initial therapeutic benefit over time may be mitigated by higher doses of a cholinesterase inhibitor.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and tolerability of increasing donepezil from 10 to 23 mg/d in patients with moderate to severe AD.

methodsThis randomized, double-blind study was conducted at 219 sites in Asia, Europe, Australia, North America, South Africa, and South America from June 6, 2007, to March 27, 2009. Patients aged 45 to 90 years with probable AD, Mini-Mental State Examination score 0 to 20 (moderate to severe impairment), and who were receiving donepezil 10 mg once daily for > or =12 weeks before the start of the study were eligible. Patients (n = 1467) were randomly assigned to receive high-dose donepezil (23 mg once daily) or standard-dose donepezil (10 mg once daily) for 24 weeks. Coprimary effectiveness measures were changes in cognition and global functioning, as assessed using least squares mean changes from baseline (LSM [SE] A) scores (last observation carried forward) on the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB; cognition) and the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input scale (CIBIC+; global function rating) overall change score (mean [SD]) at week 24. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed using spontaneous patient/caregiver reporting and open-ended questioning; clinical laboratory testing (hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis panels analyzed by a central laboratory); 12-lead ECG; and physical and neurologic examinations, including vital sign measurements.

resultsThe effectiveness analyses included 1371 patients (mean age, 73.8 years; 62.8% female; 73.5% white; weight range, 34.0-138.7 kg). A total of 296 of 981 patients (30.2%) withdrew from the donepezil 23-mg/d group; 87 of 486 patients (17.9%) withdrew from the donepezil 10-mg/d group. At study end (week 24), the LSM (SE) Delta in SIB score was significantly greater with donepezil 23 mg/d than with donepezil 10 mg/d (+2.6 [0.58] vs +0.4 [0.66], respectively; difference, 2.2; P < 0.001). The between-treatment difference in CIBIC+ score was nonsignificant (4.23 [1.07] vs 4.29 [1.07]). In post hoc analysis, LSM Delta in SIB score and CIBIC+ treatment effect at end point were greater with donepezil 23 mg/d than 10 mg/d in patients with more advanced AD compared with less impaired patients (SIB, +1.6 [0.78] vs -1.5 [0.88], respectively [P < 0.001]; CIBIC+, 4.31 [1.09] vs 4.42 [1.10] [P = 0.028]). TEAEs were reported in 710 of 963 patients (73.7%) who received donepezil 23 mg/d and in 300 of 471 patients (63.7%) who received donepezil 10 mg/d. With donepezil 23 mg/d, mild, moderate, and severe TEAEs were reported in 297 (30.8%), 332 (34.5%), and 81 (8.4%) patients, respectively; with donepezil 10 mg/d, these proportions were 147 (31.2%), 119 (25.3%), and 34 (7.2%). The 3 most common severe AEs reported with the 23-mg/d dose were nausea (9 patients [0.9%] vs 1 [0.2%] with the 10-mg/d dose), dizziness (7 [0.7%] vs 1 [0.2%]), and vomiting (6 [0.6%] vs 0). The most commonly reported TEAEs considered probably related to treatment with the 23-mg/d dose were nausea (59 patients [6.1%] vs 9 [1.9%] with the 10-mg/d dose), vomiting (48 [5.0%] vs 4 [0.8%]), and diarrhea (31 [3.2%] vs 7 [1.5%]).Thirteen deaths were reported during the study or within 30 days of study discontinuation (23 mg/d, 8 patients [0.8%]; 10 mg/d, 5 patients [1.1%]); all were considered unrelated to the study medication.

conclusionsIn this study in patients with moderate to severe AD, donepezil 23 mg/d was associated with greater benefits in cognition compared with donepezil 10 mg/d. The between-treatment difference in global functioning was not significant in the overall population. Patients with more advanced AD appeared to benefit from donepezil 23 mg/d on the assessment of global functioning, but this observation requires additional studies for confirmation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00478205.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseCholinesterase InhibitorsCognitionDonepezilDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIndansMaleMiddle AgedPiperidinesSeverity of Illness IndexCholinesterase InhibitorsDonepezilIndansPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID20678673
PMCPMC3068609
OpenAlexW2141158065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.