Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20677342›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2010

Nasogastric or nasointestinal feeding in severe acute pancreatitis.

Matteo Piciucchi, Elettra Merola, Massimo Marignani, Marianna Signoretti, Roberto Valente, Lucia Cocomello, Flavia Baccini, Francesco Panzuto, Gabriele Capurso, Gianfranco Delle Fave

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nasogastric versus nasojejunal tube feeding for severe acute pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Experience in Bedside Placement, Clinical Validity, and Cost-Efficacy of a Self-Propelled Nasojejunal Feeding Tube.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matteo PiciucchiDigestive and Liver Disease Unit, II Medical School, University Sapienza, S. Andrea Hospital, Via Di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, Italy. gianfranco.dellefave@uniroma1.it
Elettra Merola
Massimo Marignani
Marianna Signoretti
Roberto Valente
Lucia Cocomello
Flavia Baccini
Francesco Panzuto
Gabriele Capurso
Gianfranco Delle Fave
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the rate of spontaneous tube migration and to compare the effects of naso-gastric and naso-intestinal (NI) (beyond the ligament of Treitz) feeding in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP).

methodsAfter bedside intragastric insertion, tube position was assessed, and enteral nutrition (EN) started at day 4, irrespective of tube localization. Patients were monitored daily and clinical and laboratory parameters evaluated to compare the outcome of patients with nasogastric (NG) or NI tube.

resultsSpontaneous tube migration to a NI site occurred in 10/25 (40%) prospectively enrolled SAP patients, while in 15 (60%) nutrition was started with a NG tube. Groups were similar for demographics and pancreatitis aetiology but computed tomography (CT) severity index was higher in NG tube patients than in NI (mean 6.2 vs 4.7, P = 0.04). The CT index seemed a risk factor for failed obtainment of spontaneous distal migration. EN trough NG or NI tube were similar in terms of tolerability, safety, clinical goals, complications and hospital stay.

conclusionSpontaneous distal tube migration is successful in 40% of SAP patients, with higher CT severity index predicting intragastric retention; in such cases EN by NG tubes seems to provide a pragmatic alternative opportunity with similar outcomes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnteral NutritionFemaleForeign-Body MigrationHumansIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20677342
PMCPMC2915430
OpenAlexW2021218395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.