Trial reportHeart and vessels2010
Noninvasive assessment of acute cardiopulmonary effects of an oral single dose of sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension.
Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension in patients with cardiac septal defects.Pediatric cardiology · 2012Trial
- Comparison of preventive effect of sildenafil and therapeutic effect of sildenafil treatment in rats with monocrotaline-induced pulmonary arterial hypertension.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2016Article
- Monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension with sufficient tricuspid regurgitation in a rat model.Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2012Article
- Natural and unnatural history of tetralogy of Fallot repaired during adolescence and adulthood.Heart and vessels · 2012Article
- Reversible course of pulmonary arterial hypertension related to bone marrow transplantation.Heart and vessels · 2011Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to assess the acute cardiopulmonary effects of a 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil in patients with idiopathic pulmonary hypertension (IPAH) using a well-validated but less-used noninvasive echocardiographic method for the measurement of both systolic and diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), by tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity curve analysis. We studied 12 consecutive patients with IPAH (10 patients with New York Heart Association functional class III, and 2 patients with functional class II). A 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil was added to previous medications of all patients and its immediate effects were evaluated 1, 5, and 12 h after treatment. Using paired analysis, administration of a 100-mg oral single dose of sildenafil led to a significant reduction in mean PAP and a remarkable increase in pulmonary acceleration time (PAT) 1 h after treatment (P = 0.000; 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.99-26.00 and P = 0.005; 95% CI -12.89 to -2.95, respectively). In addition, although the right heart dimensions (right atrium and right ventricle) showed a trend toward improvement, the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.13 and P = 0.08, respectively). Our results demonstrated that Doppler examination of TR alone can be easily used for the estimate of systolic and diastolic PAP in patients with IPAH. This study also shows that sildenafil is the only drug given orally that can evaluate the vasodilatory capacity of the pulmonary vascular bed in patients with IPAH, with promising effects on mPAP and PAT in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.