Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20676819›Full record

ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2010

[Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Maximilian Rudert, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Florian Kratzer, Reiner Gradinger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: revision endoprosthetics].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. [Periprosthetic bone defects of the hip joint].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian RudertOrthopädische Klinik König Ludwig Haus, Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. l-orthopaedie.klh@uni-wuerzburg.de
Boris Michael Holzapfel
Florian Kratzer
Reiner Gradinger
Klinik König-Ludwig Haus · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveManagement of primary or secondary acetabular bone loss (D'Antonio type I-IV ). Implantation and stable fixation using a cementless, cranially extended oval press-fit cup to restore painless joint function and loading capacity. INDICATIONS: Septic or aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone loss after tumor resection. Primary acetabular bone defects in developmental dysplasia of the hip. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persistent deep infection. Bone defects including the parts of the iliac bone adjoining the sacrum (fixation of the stem in the ilium is not possible any more). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Complete exposure of the acetabular defect using a standard approach. Removal of the loose cup. Excision of soft and granulation tissue from the acetabular ground and the rim. Reaming of the acetabulum with sequentially larger hemispheric reamers until an adequate bony bed is created for the insertion of the cranial socket. Eccentric cranial sockets without a craniolateral flap are preferable for use in type I and II defects with teardrop lysis mostly involving the craniolateral acetabulum, if a trihedral press-fit fixation can be achieved. Supplementary screw fixation through the acetabular ground, is possible. If a type III defect is present, the authors recommend the use of cranial sockets with an anatomic flap in order to increase primary stability by supplementary screw fixation. This is especially recommended for the management of deficiencies in the medial or posterior wall. If there is pelvic discontinuity (type IV), adequate acetabular reconstruction with primary stability of the component can only be achieved by a supplementary intramedullary structured stem fixed in the dorsal part of the ilium. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial loading of the operated limb with 10 kg for a period of 6-12 weeks. Then increased loading with 10 kg per week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing. Physiotherapy and gait training.

resultsA total of 50 cup revisions using the ESKA cranial socket system were clinically and radiologically analyzed with an average follow-up of 65.7+/-28.5 months (26-123 months). Defects were classified according to D'Antonio. There were 21 type II, 23 type III, and six type IV defects. The Harris Hip Score increased from 40 preoperatively to 68.3 points postoperatively. Four patients had recurrent hip dislocation requiring replacement of the inlay. In four cases of aseptic loosening, the acetabular component had to be revised. With revision of the acetabular component as an endpoint, implant survival was 92% after an average of 5.4 years.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsAcetabulumAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMaleMiddle AgedOsteotomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresProsthesis DesignTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20676819
OpenAlexW1496146378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.