ArticleOperative Orthopadie und Traumatologie2010
[Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].
Article in Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Partial pelvic resection (internal hemipelvectomy) and endoprosthetic replacement in periacetabular tumors].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2012Trial
- Implantation Accuracy of Custom-Made Acetabular Components With Iliac Stem Fixation for Large Bone Defects in Hip Revision Surgery.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- 10-year results after primary total hip arthroplasty for severe dysplastic hip osteoarthritis with far proximal cup position.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2025Article
- Acetabular defect management and revision arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2022Article
- Custom Made Monoflange Acetabular Components for the Treatment of Paprosky Type III Defects.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Article
- [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum: revision endoprosthetics].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020Review
- Revision Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach Using an Asymmetric Acetabular Component.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty: a therapy-oriented classification.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2020Article
- [Treatment of acetabular bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty using the Revisio-System].Der Orthopade · 2017Article
- Acetabular defect classification in times of 3D imaging and patient-specific treatment protocols.Der Orthopade · 2017Review
- [Periprosthetic bone defects of the hip joint].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2014Article
- Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia using an oval-shaped cementless press-fit cup.International orthopaedics · 2012Article
- [Total hip replacement in developmental dysplasia: anatomical features and technical pitfalls].Der Orthopade · 2011Article
- [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: acetabular component].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveManagement of primary or secondary acetabular bone loss (D'Antonio type I-IV ). Implantation and stable fixation using a cementless, cranially extended oval press-fit cup to restore painless joint function and loading capacity. INDICATIONS: Septic or aseptic loosening of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular bone loss after tumor resection. Primary acetabular bone defects in developmental dysplasia of the hip. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Persistent deep infection. Bone defects including the parts of the iliac bone adjoining the sacrum (fixation of the stem in the ilium is not possible any more). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Complete exposure of the acetabular defect using a standard approach. Removal of the loose cup. Excision of soft and granulation tissue from the acetabular ground and the rim. Reaming of the acetabulum with sequentially larger hemispheric reamers until an adequate bony bed is created for the insertion of the cranial socket. Eccentric cranial sockets without a craniolateral flap are preferable for use in type I and II defects with teardrop lysis mostly involving the craniolateral acetabulum, if a trihedral press-fit fixation can be achieved. Supplementary screw fixation through the acetabular ground, is possible. If a type III defect is present, the authors recommend the use of cranial sockets with an anatomic flap in order to increase primary stability by supplementary screw fixation. This is especially recommended for the management of deficiencies in the medial or posterior wall. If there is pelvic discontinuity (type IV), adequate acetabular reconstruction with primary stability of the component can only be achieved by a supplementary intramedullary structured stem fixed in the dorsal part of the ilium. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Partial loading of the operated limb with 10 kg for a period of 6-12 weeks. Then increased loading with 10 kg per week. Thrombosis prophylaxis until full weight bearing. Physiotherapy and gait training.
resultsA total of 50 cup revisions using the ESKA cranial socket system were clinically and radiologically analyzed with an average follow-up of 65.7+/-28.5 months (26-123 months). Defects were classified according to D'Antonio. There were 21 type II, 23 type III, and six type IV defects. The Harris Hip Score increased from 40 preoperatively to 68.3 points postoperatively. Four patients had recurrent hip dislocation requiring replacement of the inlay. In four cases of aseptic loosening, the acetabular component had to be revised. With revision of the acetabular component as an endpoint, implant survival was 92% after an average of 5.4 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.