ArticleCurrent microbiology2011
New cultural approaches for microaerophilic hyperthermophiles.
Article in Current microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reports on a new culture system designed for studying the effects of nutritional factors on the growth of hyperthermophilic and chemolithotrophic microorganisms. The system comprises 5-l stainless steel jars, an automatic gas dispenser, propylene microplates, and a robotic platform. The culture system was validated using Aquifex aeolicus, a hyperthermophilic, chemolithotrophic, and microaerophilic bacterium, which requires hydrogen, oxygen, CO₂, and minerals for growth. We demonstrated that the cell densities measured on 147 cultures of A. aeolicus microplated in jar at 80°C under partial pressures (in kPa) of water vapor (47), H₂ (117.7), O₂ (28.1), CO₂ (31.4), and N₂ (3.9), followed a normal distribution, with a mean of 0.72 and a standard deviation of 0.04 (variation coefficient: 5.7%). In addition, cross-comparison of the growth kinetics of A. aeolicus in serum bottles and in a jar system highlighted similar kinetics patterns (both mean growth rates were 0.18 and 0.17 h-1, respectively), whereas the maximum cell densities reached were slightly lower in jar than in bottle (0.73 vs. 0.88 OD units, respectively). Furthermore, these results showed that, contrary to bottles, the total pressure of gas in jars remained constant throughout the biotic experiments, even with seven microplates completely filled with grown cultures. In addition, this system has been validated also for hyperthermophilic strictly anaerobes such as Thermotoga maritima or aerobes such as Sulfolobus solfataricus. This new culture system offers an interesting alternative for cultivating hyperthermophiles, using gas as substrate under constant pressure, thus making it possible to miniaturize experiments and study a large number of nutritional factors in one experimental run.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20676678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.