Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20676677›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2011

Optimization of two immunofluorescent antibodies for the detection of Escherichia coli using immunofluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry.

Moira McCarthy, Sarah C Culloty

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moira McCarthyDepartment of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science, University College Cork, The Cooperage, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. moira.mccarthy@ucc.ie
Sarah C Culloty
University College Cork · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two commercially available fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) -conjugated anti-Escherichia coli antibodies, tested for immunofluorescence were assessed for their suitability in screening E. coli using flow cytometry. Staining efficacy was initially tested using immunofluorescent microscopy; and further optimization was carried out using flow cytometry. Initially, an acetone fixation step was utilized; however, it was determined statistically that the step could be omitted without impacting the assay and thus reduce the time involved. There was no statistical difference between the staining proficiency of the two antibodies employed. The percentage staining was quite low, approximately 10% for the two antibodies, which indicated that both were equally sensitive but ultimately, more specific antibodies are required for the detection of E. coli. Known proportions of target-E. coli (10⁵, 10⁶, and 10⁷ cells/ml) were mixed with large quantities of non-target bacteria; there was a significant correlation among all the antibodies at the different bacterial cell concentrations. Therefore, despite the low staining percentage achieved on the bacterial cultures, there is a representative and comparative level of staining occurring, between samples and between bacterial strains.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBacteriological TechniquesEscherichia coliFlow CytometryFluorescent Antibody Technique, DirectMicroscopySensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingStaining and LabelingAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20676677
OpenAlexW2065989394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.