ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina2010
Incidence trend for breast cancer among young women in Goiânia, Brazil.
Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early-onset cancer in Latin America: incidence trends, evidence gaps and clinical implications.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Review
- Trends in the Incidence of Breast Cancer Following the Radiological Accident in Goiânia: A 25-Year Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2019Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer: the reality in Chile and in Latin America.Ecancermedicalscience · 2019Review
- Impact of sex, body mass index and initial pathologic diagnosis age on the incidence and prognosis of different types of cancer.Oncology reports · 2018Article
- Histological profile and age at diagnosis of breast and ovarian tumors: A register-based study in Espirito Santo, Brazil.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2013Article
- Breast cancer in young women in Latin America: an unmet, growing burden.The oncologist · 2013Article
- A review of breast cancer care and outcomes in Latin America.The oncologist · 2013Review
- Disparities in female breast cancer mortality rates in Brazil between 1980 and 2009.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CONTEXT AND
objectiveIt has been suggested that there has been a large increase in breast cancer incidence among young women over the last decade. The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of breast cancer among young women up to 39 years of age in Goiânia, between 1988 and 2003, and to compare this with other age groups. DESIGN AND
settingRetrospective study using the database of the Population-based Cancer Registry of Goiânia, State of Goiás, Brazil.
methodsThe incidence was calculated according to age groups: up to 39 years, 40 to 59 years and 60 years and over. Average annual percentage changes (AAPCs) were estimated for the different age groups using Poisson regression.
resultsOver this period, 3,310 new cases were recorded. The standardized incidence was 2.89/100,000 in 1988 and increased to 6.37/100,000 in 2003 (R(2) = 0.52) for the group aged up to 39 years (p < 0.003). For the group from 40 to 59 years old, the incidence was 14.39/100,000 in 1988 and 41.70/100,000 in 2003 (R(2) = 0.85; p < 0.001). For the group aged 60 years and over, it was 17.62/100,000 and 28.49/100,000, respectively (R(2) = 0.67; p < 0.001). The AAPCs were 5.22%, 5.53% and 4.54% for the age groups up to 39, 40 to 59 and 60 years and over, respectively.
conclusionsThe incidence of breast cancer among young women in Goiânia has been increasing significantly, although this change was similar to the increase in other age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.