Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20676404›Full record

ArticlePloS one2010

Synaptotoxicity of Alzheimer beta amyloid can be explained by its membrane perforating property.

Fernando J Sepulveda, Jorge Parodi, Robert W Peoples, Carlos Opazo, Luis G Aguayo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. hLife · 2026
    Review
  2. Decoding the mechanisms of amyloid-β in synaptic toxicity.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026
    Review
  3. Membrane Pore Formation by Peptides Studied by Fluorescence Techniques.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Endogenous Amyloid-formed CaFunction (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fernando J SepulvedaLaboratory of Neurophysiology, Department of Physiology, University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
Jorge Parodi
Robert W Peoples
Carlos Opazo
Luis G Aguayo
University of Concepción · CLMarquette University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms that induce Alzheimer's disease (AD) are largely unknown thereby deterring the development of disease-modifying therapies. One working hypothesis of AD is that Abeta excess disrupts membranes causing pore formation leading to alterations in ionic homeostasis. However, it is largely unknown if this also occurs in native brain neuronal membranes. Here we show that similar to other pore forming toxins, Abeta induces perforation of neuronal membranes causing an increase in membrane conductance, intracellular calcium and ethidium bromide influx. These data reveal that the target of Abeta is not another membrane protein, but that Abeta itself is the cellular target thereby explaining the failure of current therapies to interfere with the course of AD. We propose that this novel effect of Abeta could be useful for the discovery of anti AD drugs capable of blocking these "Abeta perforates". In addition, we demonstrate that peptides that block Abeta neurotoxicity also slow or prevent the membrane-perforating action of Abeta.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAnimalsBlotting, WesternCalciumCell MembraneCells, CulturedFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsPeptidesPregnancyRatsAmyloid beta-PeptidesCalciumPeptides

Identifiers

PMID20676404
PMCPMC2910737
OpenAlexW1584494420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.