Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20675688›Full record

SynthesisTobacco control2010

Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carolyn J Heckman, Brian L Egleston, Makary T Hofmann

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tobacco control, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 153 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
153citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01656083 unknown statusnot on this map

The Compliance of Varenicline Usage and the Smoking Abstinence Rate Via Mobile Phone Text Messaging Combine With Varenicline: a Single-blind, Randomised Control Trial

TypeobservationalSponsoryu hong xiaRan2010 to 2012Enrolled220ConditionsSmoking
NCT06449521 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Type II Hybrid Implementation-effectiveness Study of BECOME (BEhavioral Community-based COmbined Intervention for MEntal Health and Noncommunicable Diseases) Delivered by Community Health Workers in Nepal

TypeinterventionalSponsorPossibleRan2024 to 2028Enrolled700ConditionsMental Health Disorder, Non Communicable DiseasesArmsBECOME intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

153 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. A Qualitative Systematic Review of Cigarette Smoking Cessation Interventions for Persons Living with HIV.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Motivational Interviewing to Encourage Quit Attempts Among Smokers Not Ready to Quit: A Trial-Based Economic Analysis.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  16. Web-Based Contingency Management for Adolescent Tobacco Smokers: A Clinical Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

93 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolyn J HeckmanFox Chase Cancer Center, 510 Township Line Road, First Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19012, USA. Carolyn.Heckman@fccc.edu
Brian L Egleston
Makary T Hofmann

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Eric Andrew Ross · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
Skin Savvy StudyK07CA108685 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HECKMAN, CAROLYN · 2005 to 2009
$654k
NCI NIH HHS CA006927NCI NIH HHS CA108685NCI NIH HHS K07 CA108685NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of interventions incorporating motivational interviewing for smoking cessation and identify correlates of treatment effects. DATA SOURCES: Medline/PubMed, PsycInfo and other sources including grey literature. STUDY SELECTION: Title/abstract search terms were motivational interview* OR motivational enhancement AND smok*, cigarette*, tobacco, OR nicotine. Randomised trials reporting number of smokers abstinent at follow up were eligible. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were independently coded by the first and third authors. We coded for a variety of study, participant, and intervention related variables. DATA SYNTHESIS: A random effects logistic regression with both a random intercept and a random slope for the treatment effect.

results31 smoking cessation research trials were selected for the study: eight comprised adolescent samples, eight comprised adults with chronic physical or mental illness, five comprised pregnant/postpartum women and 10 comprised other adult samples. Analysis of the trials (9485 individual participants) showed an overall OR comparing likelihood of abstinence in the motivational interviewing (MI) versus control condition of OR 1.45 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.83). Additional potential correlates of treatment effects such as study, sample, and intervention characteristics were examined.

conclusionsThis is the most comprehensive review of MI for smoking cessation conducted to date. These findings suggest that current MI smoking cessation approaches can be effective for adolescents and adults. However, comparative efficacy trials could be useful.

Indexed as

CounselingInterviews as TopicMotivationHumansLogistic ModelsSmoking CessationTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20675688
PMCPMC2947553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.