Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20675453›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Interaction of Mycobacterium ulcerans with mosquito species: implications for transmission and trophic relationships.

John R Wallace, Matthew C Gordon, Lindsey Hartsell, Lydia Mosi, M Eric Benbow, Richard W Merritt, Pamela L C Small

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. AtypicalJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Linking theOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Buruli Ulcer: a Review of the Current Knowledge.Current tropical medicine reports · 2018
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evidences of the Low Implication of Mosquitoes in the Transmission ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

John R WallaceDepartment of Biology, Millersville University, Millersville, Pennsylvania 17551, USA.
Matthew C Gordon
Lindsey Hartsell
Lydia Mosi
M Eric Benbow
Richard W Merritt
Pamela L C Small

Funding

Ecological relationships of Mycobacterium InfectionR01TW007550 · FIC · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MERRITT, RICHARD WILLIAM · 2005 to 2009
$2.0M
The role of aquatic Invertebrates in M. ulcerans DiseaseR03AI062719 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MERRITT, RICHARD WILLIAM · 2005 to 2006
$141k
FIC NIH HHS R01 TW007550FIC NIH HHS R01TW007550NIAID NIH HHS R03 AI062719NIAID NIH HHS R03AI062719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium ulcerans is the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, a severe necrotizing skin disease that causes significant morbidity in Africa and Australia. Person-to-person transmission of Buruli ulcer is rare. Throughout Africa and Australia infection is associated with residence near slow-moving or stagnant water bodies. Although M. ulcerans DNA has been detected in over 30 taxa of invertebrates, fish, water filtrate, and plant materials and one environmental isolate cultured from a water strider (Gerridae), the invertebrate taxa identified are not adapted to feed on humans, and the mode of transmission for Buruli ulcer remains an enigma. Recent epidemiological reports from Australia describing the presence of M. ulcerans DNA in adult mosquitoes have led to the hypothesis that mosquitoes play an important role in the transmission of M. ulcerans. In this study we have investigated the potential of mosquitoes to serve as biological or mechanical vectors or as environmental reservoirs for M. ulcerans. Here we show that Aedes aegypti, A. albopictus, Ochlerotatus triseriatus, and Culex restuans larvae readily ingest wild-type M. ulcerans, isogenic toxin-negative mutants, and Mycobacterium marinum isolates and remain infected throughout larval development. However, the infections are not carried over into the pupae or adult mosquitoes, suggesting an unlikely role for mosquitoes as biological vectors. By following M. ulcerans through a food chain consisting of primary (mosquito larvae), secondary (predatory mosquito larva from Toxorhynchites rutilus septentrionalis), and tertiary (Belostoma species) consumers, we have shown that M. ulcerans can be productively maintained in an aquatic food web.

Indexed as

Food ChainAnimalsBuruli UlcerCulicidaeDNA PrimersInsect VectorsLarvaModels, BiologicalMycobacterium ulceransPolymerase Chain ReactionTennesseeDNA Primers

Identifiers

PMID20675453
PMCPMC2937476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.