Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20674473›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2010

Nanoscale interfaces to biology.

Sunho Park, Kimberly Hamad-Schifferli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nanoparticle-Cell Interactions: Relevance for Public Health.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. More effective nanomedicines through particle design.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sunho ParkDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Kimberly Hamad-Schifferli

Funding

Using nanoparticle-DNA to enhance antisense gene regulationR21EB008156 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HAMAD-SCHIFFERLI, KIMBERLY · 2007 to 2008
$406k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB008156NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB008156-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanotechnology has held great promise for revolutionizing biology. The biological behavior of nanomaterials depends primarily on how they interface to biomolecules and their surroundings. Unfortunately, interface issues like non-specific adsorption are still the biggest obstacles to the success of nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine, and have held back widespread practical use of nanotechnology in biology. Not only does the biological interface of nanoparticles (NPs) need to be understood and controlled, but also NPs must be treated as biological entities rather than inorganic ones. Furthermore, one can adopt an engineering perspective of the NP-biological interface, realizing that it has unique, exploitable properties.

Indexed as

AdsorptionBiologyDNAHumansNanotechnologyProteinsDNAProteins

Identifiers

PMID20674473
PMCPMC2953582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.