Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20674116›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2010

Exploring the use of social network methods in designing healthcare quality improvement teams.

David Meltzer, Jeanette Chung, Parham Khalili, Elizabeth Marlow, Vineet Arora, Glen Schumock, Ron Burt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The development of trauma-informed community partnerships: A mixed method social network study.Human service organizations, management, leadership & governance · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David MeltzerThe University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States. dmeltzer@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu
Jeanette Chung
Parham Khalili
Elizabeth Marlow
Vineet Arora
Glen Schumock
Ron Burt
University of Chicago · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Hospital Medicine and Economics Centers for Education & Research for TherapeuticsU18HS016967 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2007 to 2010
$4.0M
Research and Mentoring in Cost-effectiveness and Hospital-based Elder CareK24AG031326 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MELTZER, DAVID O · 2008 to 2012
$906k
AHRQ HHS U18 HS016967AHRQ HHS U18 HS016967-01NIA NIH HHS K24 AG031326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teams are an integral component of quality improvement efforts in healthcare organizations. Quality improvement teams may involve persons either from the same or different disciplines. In either case, the selection of team members may be critical to the team's success. However, there is little research to guide selection of team members for quality improvement teams. In this paper, we use tools from social network analysis (SNA) to derive principles for the design of effective clinical quality improvement teams and explore the implementation of these principles using social network data collected from the inpatient general medicine services at a large academic medical center in Chicago, USA. While the concept of multidisciplinary teams focuses on the importance of the professional background of team members, SNA emphasizes the importance of the individual and collective connections of team members, both to persons outside the team and to each other. SNA also focuses on the location of individuals and groups between other actors in the flow of information and other resources within larger organizational networks. We hypothesize that external connections may be most important when the collection or dissemination of information or influence are the greatest concerns, while the relationship of team members to each other may matter most when internal coordination, knowledge sharing, and within-group communication are most important. Our data suggest that the social networks of the attending physicians can be characterized sociometrically and that new sociometric measures such as "net degree" may be useful in identifying teams with the greatest potential for external influence.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsSocial SupportAcademic Medical CentersChicagoFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMalePatient Care TeamPersonnel SelectionQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID20674116
PMCPMC2931366
OpenAlexW1992854878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.