Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20673321›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2010

RuleMonkey: software for stochastic simulation of rule-based models.

Joshua Colvin, Michael I Monine, Ryan N Gutenkunst, William S Hlavacek, Daniel D Von Hoff, Richard G Posner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Programmatic modeling for biological systems.Current opinion in systems biology · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MCell-R: A Particle-Resolution Network-Free Spatial Modeling Framework.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multi-state modeling of biomolecules.PLoS computational biology · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua ColvinClinical Translational Research Division, Translational Genomics Research Institute, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA.
Michael I Monine
Ryan N Gutenkunst
William S Hlavacek
Daniel D Von Hoff
Richard G Posner
Los Alamos National Laboratory · USTranslational Genomics Research Institute · US

Funding

Validation of Amplified Genes in Pancreatic CancerP01CA109552 · NCI · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI VON HOFF, DANIEL D · 2005 to 2009
$15.2M
Genetics Pathways of Glioma InvasionR01NS042262 · NINDS · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI BERENS, MICHAEL E. · 2001 to 2008
$3.0M
COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR RULE-BASED MODELING OF BIOCHEMICAL SYSTEMSR01GM076570 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI HLAVACEK, WILLIAM S · 2007 to 2009
$815k
Receptor Aggregation on the Cell SurfaceR01AI035997 · NIAID · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI POSNER, RICHARD G · 2002 to 2006
$701k
RECEPTOR AGGREGATION ON THE CELL SURFACER29AI035997 · NIAID · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI POSNER, RICHARD G · 1993 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS CA109552NIAID NIH HHS AI35997NIGMS NIH HHS GM076570NINDS NIH HHS NS042262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe system-level dynamics of many molecular interactions, particularly protein-protein interactions, can be conveniently represented using reaction rules, which can be specified using model-specification languages, such as the BioNetGen language (BNGL). A set of rules implicitly defines a (bio)chemical reaction network. The reaction network implied by a set of rules is often very large, and as a result, generation of the network implied by rules tends to be computationally expensive. Moreover, the cost of many commonly used methods for simulating network dynamics is a function of network size. Together these factors have limited application of the rule-based modeling approach. Recently, several methods for simulating rule-based models have been developed that avoid the expensive step of network generation. The cost of these "network-free" simulation methods is independent of the number of reactions implied by rules. Software implementing such methods is now needed for the simulation and analysis of rule-based models of biochemical systems.

resultsHere, we present a software tool called RuleMonkey, which implements a network-free method for simulation of rule-based models that is similar to Gillespie's method. The method is suitable for rule-based models that can be encoded in BNGL, including models with rules that have global application conditions, such as rules for intramolecular association reactions. In addition, the method is rejection free, unlike other network-free methods that introduce null events, i.e., steps in the simulation procedure that do not change the state of the reaction system being simulated. We verify that RuleMonkey produces correct simulation results, and we compare its performance against DYNSTOC, another BNGL-compliant tool for network-free simulation of rule-based models. We also compare RuleMonkey against problem-specific codes implementing network-free simulation methods.

conclusionsRuleMonkey enables the simulation of rule-based models for which the underlying reaction networks are large. It is typically faster than DYNSTOC for benchmark problems that we have examined. RuleMonkey is freely available as a stand-alone application http://public.tgen.org/rulemonkey. It is also available as a simulation engine within GetBonNie, a web-based environment for building, analyzing and sharing rule-based models.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, BiologicalSoftwareInternetProteinsSignal TransductionSystems BiologyProteins

Identifiers

PMID20673321
PMCPMC2921409
OpenAlexW1996984709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.