ArticleBiomacromolecules2010
Biophysical characterization of copolymer-protected gene vectors.
Article in Biomacromolecules, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Morphology, structure and function characterization of PEI modified magnetic nanoparticles gene delivery system.PloS one · 2014Article
- Optimizing adenoviral transduction of endothelial cells under flow conditions.Pharmaceutical research · 2012Article
- Synthesis and characterization of new poly(ortho ester amidine) copolymers for nonviral gene delivery.Polymer · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A copolymer-protected gene vector (COPROG) is a three-component gene delivery system consisting of a preformed DNA and branched polyethylenimine (bPEI) complex subsequently modified by the addition of a copolymer (P6YE5C) incorporating both poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) and anionic peptides. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), we characterized and compared the self-assembly of bPEI/DNA particles and COPROG complexes. In low salt buffer, both bPEI/DNA and COPROG formulations form stable nanoparticles with hydrodynamic radii between 60-120 nm. COPROG particles, as compared to bPEI/DNA, show greatly improved particle stability to both physiological salt as well as low pH conditions. Binding stoichiometry of the three-component COPROG system was investigated by dual-color fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS). It was found that a significant fraction of P6YE5C copolymer aggregates with excess bPEI forming bPEI/P6YE5C "ghost complexes" with no DNA inside. The ratio of ghost particles to COPROG complexes is about 4:1. In addition, we find a large fraction of excess P6YE5C copolymer, which remains unbound in solution. We observe a 2-4-fold enhanced reporter gene expression with COPROG formulations at various equivalents as compared to bPEI-DNA alone. We believe that both complex stabilization as well as the capture of excess bPEI into ghost particles induced by the copolymer is responsible for the improvement in gene expression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.