Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20671040›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2011

Whole-genome expression plasticity across tropical and temperate Drosophila melanogaster populations from Eastern Australia.

Mia T Levine, Melissa L Eckert, David J Begun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mia T LevineDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, USA. mlevine@fhcrc.org
Melissa L Eckert
David J Begun

Funding

Genomic analysis of adaptation in DrosophilaR01GM084056 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BEGUN, DAVID J · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM084056NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genotypic signature of spatially varying selection is ubiquitous across the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Spatially structured adaptive phenotypic differences are also commonly found, particularly along New World and Australian latitudinal gradients. However, investigation of gene expression variation in one or multiple environments across these well-studied populations is surprisingly limited. Here, we report genome-wide transcript levels of tropical and temperate eastern Australian populations reared at two temperatures. As expected, a large number of genes exhibit geographic origin-dependent expression plasticity. Less expected was evidence for an enrichment of down-regulated genes in both temperate and tropical populations when lines were reared at the temperature less commonly encountered in the native range; that is, evidence for significant differences in a "directionality" of plasticity across these two climatic regions. We also report evidence of small scale "neighborhood effects" around those genes significant for geographic origin-dependent plasticity, a result consistent with the evolution of high level, likely chromatin based gene regulation during range expansion in D. melanogaster populations.

Indexed as

ClimateEvolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationGenetics, PopulationGenome, InsectAcclimatizationAnimalsAustraliaChromatinDrosophila melanogasterEnvironmentGenetic VariationGenotypeMalePhenotypeTemperatureChromatin

Identifiers

PMID20671040
PMCPMC3002243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.