ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2010
Automatically extracting information needs from complex clinical questions.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Ocular Surface Microbiome in Homeostasis and Dysbiosis.Microorganisms · 2025Review
- Sentences, entities, and keyphrases extraction from consumer health forums using multi-task learning.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025Article
- List-wise learning to rank biomedical question-answer pairs with deep ranking recursive autoencoders.PloS one · 2020Article
- Differences in Perceptions of Health Information Between the Public and Health Care Professionals: Nonprobability Sampling Questionnaire Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Classifying Chinese Questions Related to Health Care Posted by Consumers Via the Internet.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Resource Classification for Medical Questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016Article
- Semantic biomedical resource discovery: a Natural Language Processing framework.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- Multi-topic assignment for exploratory navigation of consumer health information in NetWellness using formal concept analysis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2014Article
- Determining primary care physician information needs to inform ambulatory visit note display.Applied clinical informatics · 2014Article
- Article
- Usability survey of biomedical question answering systems.Human genomics · 2012Review
- The biomedical discourse relation bank.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveClinicians pose complex clinical questions when seeing patients, and identifying the answers to those questions in a timely manner helps improve the quality of patient care. We report here on two natural language processing models, namely, automatic topic assignment and keyword identification, that together automatically and effectively extract information needs from ad hoc clinical questions. Our study is motivated in the context of developing the larger clinical question answering system AskHERMES (Help clinicians to Extract and aRrticulate Multimedia information for answering clinical quEstionS). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: We developed supervised machine-learning systems to automatically assign predefined general categories (e.g. etiology, procedure, and diagnosis) to a question. We also explored both supervised and unsupervised systems to automatically identify keywords that capture the main content of the question.
resultsWe evaluated our systems on 4654 annotated clinical questions that were collected in practice. We achieved an F1 score of 76.0% for the task of general topic classification and 58.0% for keyword extraction. Our systems have been implemented into the larger question answering system AskHERMES. Our error analyses suggested that inconsistent annotation in our training data have hurt both question analysis tasks.
conclusionOur systems, available at http://www.askhermes.org, can automatically extract information needs from both short (the number of word tokens <20) and long questions (the number of word tokens >20), and from both well-structured and ill-formed questions. We speculate that the performance of general topic classification and keyword extraction can be further improved if consistently annotated data are made available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.