Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20670693›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2010

Automatically extracting information needs from complex clinical questions.

Yong-gang Cao, James J Cimino, John Ely, Hong Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Qcorp: an annotated classification corpus of Chinese health questions.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Resource Classification for Medical Questions.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The biomedical discourse relation bank.BMC bioinformatics · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yong-gang CaoUniversity of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2400 Hartford Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA.
James J Cimino
John Ely
Hong Yu

Funding

Exploring Natural Language Processing, Image Processing, Machine Learning, and UsR01GM095476 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI YU, HONG · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
HERMES - Help physicians to Extract and aRticulate Multimedia information from liR01LM009836 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE · PI YU, HONG · 2007 to 2009
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM095476NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM009836NLM NIH HHS R01 LM009836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveClinicians pose complex clinical questions when seeing patients, and identifying the answers to those questions in a timely manner helps improve the quality of patient care. We report here on two natural language processing models, namely, automatic topic assignment and keyword identification, that together automatically and effectively extract information needs from ad hoc clinical questions. Our study is motivated in the context of developing the larger clinical question answering system AskHERMES (Help clinicians to Extract and aRrticulate Multimedia information for answering clinical quEstionS). DESIGN AND MEASUREMENTS: We developed supervised machine-learning systems to automatically assign predefined general categories (e.g. etiology, procedure, and diagnosis) to a question. We also explored both supervised and unsupervised systems to automatically identify keywords that capture the main content of the question.

resultsWe evaluated our systems on 4654 annotated clinical questions that were collected in practice. We achieved an F1 score of 76.0% for the task of general topic classification and 58.0% for keyword extraction. Our systems have been implemented into the larger question answering system AskHERMES. Our error analyses suggested that inconsistent annotation in our training data have hurt both question analysis tasks.

conclusionOur systems, available at http://www.askhermes.org, can automatically extract information needs from both short (the number of word tokens <20) and long questions (the number of word tokens >20), and from both well-structured and ill-formed questions. We speculate that the performance of general topic classification and keyword extraction can be further improved if consistently annotated data are made available.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceDatabases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID20670693
PMCPMC2991382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.