Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20670428›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2010

The relationship between staff skill mix, costs and outcomes in intermediate care services.

Simon Dixon, Billingsley Kaambwa, Susan Nancarrow, Graham P Martin, Stirling Bryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Assessing patient preferences for the delivery of different community-based models of care using a discrete choice experiment.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon DixonSchool of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK.
Billingsley Kaambwa
Susan Nancarrow
Graham P Martin
Stirling Bryan

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between skill mix, patient outcomes, length of stay and service costs in older peoples' intermediate care services in England.

methodsWe undertook multivariate analysis of data collected as part of the National Evaluation of Intermediate Care Services. Data were analysed on between 337 and 403 older people admitted to 14 different intermediate care teams. Independent variables were the numbers of different types of staff within a team and the ratio of support staff to professionally qualified staff within teams. Outcome measures include the Barthel index, EQ-5D, length of service provision and costs of care.

resultsIncreased skill mix (raising the number of different types of staff by one) is associated with a 17% reduction in service costs (p = 0.011). There is weak evidence (p = 0.090) that a higher ratio of support staff to qualified staff leads to greater improvements in EQ-5D scores of patients.

conclusionsThis study provides limited evidence on the relationship between multidisciplinary skill mix and outcomes in intermediate care services.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePersonnel Staffing and SchedulingAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFemaleHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntermediate Care FacilitiesLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOrganizational Case StudiesPrimary Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20670428
PMCPMC2921080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.