Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20667142›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2010

Efficacy of bacterial ribosomal RNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative PCR for detecting neonatal sepsis: a case control study.

Makoto Fujimori, Ken Hisata, Satoru Nagata, Nobuaki Matsunaga, Mitsutaka Komatsu, Hiromichi Shoji, Hiroaki Sato, Yuichiro Yamashiro, Takashi Asahara, Koji Nomoto and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Single enzyme RT-PCR of full-length ribosomal RNA.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
  9. How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis?International journal of pediatrics · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Makoto FujimoriDepartment of Pediatrics, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. makotto@juntendo.ac.jp
Ken Hisata
Satoru Nagata
Nobuaki Matsunaga
Mitsutaka Komatsu
Hiromichi Shoji
Hiroaki Sato
Yuichiro Yamashiro
Takashi Asahara
Koji Nomoto
Toshiaki Shimizu
Juntendo University · JPYakult Central Institute · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeonatal sepsis is difficult to diagnose and pathogens cannot be detected from blood cultures in many cases. Development of a rapid and accurate method for detecting pathogens is thus essential. The main purpose of this study was to identify etiological agents in clinically diagnosed neonatal sepsis using bacterial ribosomal RNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (BrRNA-RT-qPCR) and to conduct comparisons with the results of conventional blood culture. Since BrRNA-RT-qPCR targets bacterial ribosomal RNA, detection rates using this approach may exceed those using conventional PCR.

methodsSubjects comprised 36 patients with 39 episodes of suspected neonatal sepsis who underwent BrRNA-RT-qPCR and conventional blood culture to diagnose sepsis. Blood samples were collected aseptically for BrRNA-RT-qPCR and blood culture at the time of initial sepsis evaluation by arterial puncture. BrRNA-RT-qPCR and blood culture were undertaken using identical blood samples, and BrRNA-RT-qPCR was performed using 12 primer sets.

resultsPositive rate was significantly higher for BrRNA-RT-qPCR (15/39, 38.5%) than for blood culture (6/39, 15.4%; p = 0.0039). BrRNA-RT-qPCR was able to identify all pathogens detected by blood culture. Furthermore, this method detected pathogens from neonates with clinical sepsis in whom pathogens was not detected by culture methods.

conclusionsThis RT-PCR technique is useful for sensitive detection of pathogens causing neonatal sepsis, even in cases with negative results by blood culture.

Indexed as

Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionBacteriaBacterial InfectionsBacteriological TechniquesCase-Control StudiesHumansInfant, NewbornRNA, BacterialRNA, RibosomalSensitivity and SpecificitySepsisRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID20667142
PMCPMC2922101
OpenAlexW2085169598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.