Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20667100›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Replication-biased genome organisation in the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus.

Anders F Andersson, Erik A Pelve, Stefan Lindeberg, Magnus Lundgren, Peter Nilsson, Rolf Bernander

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genome Replication inFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  8. Coevolution of the Organization and Structure of Prokaryotic Genomes.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The cell cycle of archaea.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2013
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Hot transcriptomics.Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.) · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anders F AnderssonDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. doubleanders@gmail.com
Erik A Pelve
Stefan Lindeberg
Magnus Lundgren
Peter Nilsson
Rolf Bernander
Uppsala University · SEInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpecies of the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus harbour three replication origins in their single circular chromosome that are synchronously initiated during replication.

resultsWe demonstrate that global gene expression in two Sulfolobus species is highly biased, such that early replicating genome regions are more highly expressed at all three origins. The bias by far exceeds what would be anticipated by gene dosage effects alone. In addition, early replicating regions are denser in archaeal core genes (enriched in essential functions), display lower intergenic distances, and are devoid of mobile genetic elements.

conclusionThe strong replication-biased structuring of the Sulfolobus chromosome implies that the multiple replication origins serve purposes other than simply shortening the time required for replication. The higher-level chromosomal organisation could be of importance for minimizing the impact of DNA damage, and may also be linked to transcriptional regulation.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationChromosomes, ArchaealDNA, ArchaealGene Expression ProfilingGenome, ArchaealGenomicsSulfolobusDNA, Archaeal

Identifiers

PMID20667100
PMCPMC3091651
OpenAlexW1985598198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.