Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20663239›Full record

Trial reportInternational psychogeriatrics2010

Readiness to use compensatory strategies among older adults with functional difficulties.

Karen C Rose, Laura N Gitlin, Marie P Dennis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International psychogeriatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07383727 (Readiness to Change and the Implementation of Home Modifications for Adults Over 60), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07383727 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Readiness to Change and the Implementation of Home Modifications for Adults Over 60

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VermontRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsOlder Adults (60 - 85 Years Old)ArmsFace-to-face educational session, On-line educational session
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nonmedical treatment of patients with dementia.Innovations in clinical neuroscience · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen C RoseDepartment of Psychology, Widener University, Chester, PA 19013, USA. kcrose@widener.edu
Laura N Gitlin
Marie P Dennis
Thomas Jefferson University · USWidener University · US

Funding

ENHANCING FUNCTION OF FRAIL ELDERS BY MODIFYING THE HOMER01AG013687 · NIA · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI GITLIN, LAURA N. · 1999 to 2003
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013687NIA NIH HHS R01 AG13687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompensatory strategies (behavioral/environmental modifications) can reduce the difficulties of performing daily living activities, fear of falling, and mortality risk. However, individuals vary in their readiness to use strategies. We examined characteristics associated with readiness to use compensatory strategies, the extent to which level of readiness changed from participation in an intervention (Advancing Better Living for Elders (ABLE)) providing compensatory strategies, and factors predictive of change in readiness level.

methodsData from a randomized trial were used. Participants were 148 older adults assigned to the ABLE intervention designed to enhance daily function through compensatory strategy use. Baseline measures included demographic characteristics, functional difficulty level, presence/absence of depressive symptoms, compensatory strategy use, and social support. At initial (2 weeks from baseline) and final (6 months) ABLE sessions, interventionists rated readiness (1 = precontemplation; 2 = contemplation; 3 = preparation; 4 = action/maintenance) of participants to use strategies. Ordinal logistic regression was used to identify baseline characteristics associated with initial readiness rating. A McNemar-Bowker test of symmetry was used to describe change in readiness, and binary logistic regression was used to identify baseline predictors of change in readiness (from initial to final intervention session).

resultsAt the initial intervention session, 70.3% (N = 104) scored in pre-action (precontemplation/contemplation, preparation), and 29.7% (N = 44) in action/maintenance. Depressive symptomatology (χ2(2) = 9.08, p = 0.011) and low compensatory strategy use (F(2, 147) = 8.44, p = 0.001) at baseline were associated with lower readiness levels at initial ABLE session. By final ABLE session, most participants demonstrated greater readiness: 72% (N = 105) in action/maintenance, 28% (N = 41) in pre-action (two participants dropped out). A significant baseline predictor of positive change in readiness (from initial to final session) was higher social support levels (b = 0.10, SE = 0.05, Wald = 4.98, p = 0.026).

conclusionWhereas presence of depressive symptomatology and lower use of compensatory strategies at baseline were associated with lower readiness at initial intervention session, neither predicted change in readiness level. Thus, mood and prior compensatory strategy use do not effect enhancements in readiness to use strategies provided in an intervention. Baseline social support was the strongest predictor of change in readiness suggesting that interventions may need to involve older adults' social networks to enhance acceptability of compensatory strategy use.

Indexed as

Motor ActivityQuality of LifeSocial SupportActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMaleRegression AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID20663239
PMCPMC4091664
OpenAlexW2158318318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.