Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20663209›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2010

Accelerometer-based physical activity in a large observational cohort--study protocol and design of the activity and function of the elderly in Ulm (ActiFE Ulm) study.

Michael D Denkinger, Sebastian Franke, Kilian Rapp, Gudrun Weinmayr, Enric Duran-Tauleria, Thorsten Nikolaus, Richard Peter, ActiFE Ulm Study Group

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The relationship of weather with daily physical activity and the time spent out of home in older adults from Germany - the ActiFE study.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health and Subjective Views on Aging: Longitudinal Findings From the ActiFE Ulm Study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Lazy Sundays: role of day of the week and reactivity on objectively measured physical activity in older people.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prospective analysis of time out-of-home and objectively measured walking duration during a week in a large cohort of older adults.European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael D DenkingerAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic, Ulm, Germany. mdenkinger@web.de
Sebastian Franke
Kilian Rapp
Gudrun Weinmayr
Enric Duran-Tauleria
Thorsten Nikolaus
Richard Peter
ActiFE Ulm Study Group
Universität Ulm · DEAgaplesion Bethesda Klinik · DEHospital Del Mar · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large number of studies have demonstrated a positive effect of increased physical activity (PA) on various health outcomes. In all large geriatric studies, however, PA has only been assessed by interview-based instruments which are all subject to substantial bias. This may represent one reason why associations of PA with geriatric syndromes such as falls show controversial results. The general aim of the Active-Ulm study was to determine the association of accelerometer-based physical activity with different health-related parameters, and to study the influence of this standardized objective measure of physical activity on health- and disability-related parameters in a longitudinal setting.

methodsWe have set up an observational cohort study in 1500 community dwelling older persons (65 to 90 years) stratified by age and sex. Addresses have been obtained from the local residents registration offices. The study is carried out jointly with the IMCA--Respiratory Health Survey in the Elderly implemented in the context of the European project IMCA II. The study has a cross-sectional part (1) which focuses on PA and disability and two longitudinal parts (2) and (3). The primary information for part (2) is a prospective 1 year falls calendar including assessment of medication change. Part (3) will be performed about 36 months following baseline. Primary variables of interest include disability, PA, falls and cognitive function. Baseline recruitment has started in March 2009 and will be finished in April 2010.All participants are visited three times within one week, either at home or in the study center. Assessments included interviews on quality of life, diagnosed diseases, common risk factors as well as novel cognitive tests and established tests of physical functioning. PA is measured using an accelerometer-based sensor device, carried continuously over a one week period and accompanied by a prospective activity diary. DISCUSSION: The assessment of PA using a high standard accelerometer-based device is feasible in a large population-based study. The results obtained from cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses will shed light on important associations between PA and various outcomes and may provide information for specific interventions in older people.

Indexed as

AccelerationClinical ProtocolsAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMotor ActivityQuality of LifeRandom AllocationRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID20663209
PMCPMC2919539
OpenAlexW2081711852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.