Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20663207›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2010

APCAP--activated protein C in acute pancreatitis: a double-blind randomized human pilot trial.

Ville Pettilä, Lea Kyhälä, Marja-Leena Kylänpää, Ari Leppäniemi, Minna Tallgren, Antti Markkola, Pauli Puolakkainen, Heikki Repo, Esko Kemppainen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01017107 (APCAP - Activated Protein C in Severe Acute Pancreatitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01017107 phase4completednot on this map

APCAP - Activated Protein C in Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Double-blind Randomized Human Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2003 to 2007Enrolled32ConditionsAcute PancreatitisArmsActivated protein C
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Obesity and pancreatitis.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Drug Therapy for Acute Pancreatitis.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Pharmacologic therapy for acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Pathogenic mechanisms of acute pancreatitis.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2012
    Review
  16. Acute and chronic pancreatic inflammation.International journal of inflammation · 2012
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Molecular mechanisms of pancreatic injury.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2011
    Review
  20. Early management of severe acute pancreatitis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ville PettiläDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 2, Helsinki 00029, Finland. ville.pettila@hus.fi
Lea Kyhälä
Marja-Leena Kylänpää
Ari Leppäniemi
Minna Tallgren
Antti Markkola
Pauli Puolakkainen
Heikki Repo
Esko Kemppainen
Helsinki University Hospital · FIAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AUUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious human studies have shown low activity of protein C (APC) in severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). This, together with the findings in animal models, suggests that activated protein C (APC) may protect against pancreatic injury and ameliorate the disease. We, therefore, evaluated its effect on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) measured by the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) and on organ-failure-free days, and the safety of APC in SAP.

methodsA prospective double blind randomized pilot study was use. The study occurred in one university hospital tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) with eight beds. The patients were chosen according to the following inclusion criteria: 1) Those admitted to the hospital < 96 h from the onset of pain, 2) Those who had a three-fold increase in serum amylase over normal upper range or/and in whom computed tomography (CT) verification of SAP was noted, 3) Those who had one or more organ dysfunction (OD), and 4) Those in whom less than 48 hours had passed since their first OD. Of a total of 215 adult patients with SAP screened between June 2003 and August 2007, 158 fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. After exclusions 32 patients were randomized to the study. The intervention consisted of APC (N = 16) administered intravenously for 96 hours with a dose of 24 μg/kg/hour or placebo (N = 16) with a similar infusion rate. The sample size for the study was calculated according to the primary end-point: the change in SOFA during study drug infusion (Days 0 and 5). Comparisons between the study groups were performed using patient-related changes and calculation of difference in means (DIM, 95% CIs) and regarding categorical variables with Fisher's exact test. For all comparisons P < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsNo serious bleeding was detected clinically or by CT scans in either group. No significant difference in SOFA score change between the APC and placebo groups was found (difference in means (DIM) +2.3, 95% CI -0.7 to +5.3). Treatment with APC was associated with an increase in serum levels of both total and conjugated bilirubin. No differences in ventilator-free days, in renal replacement therapy-free days, in vasopressor-free days, or in days alive outside the hospital were detected.

conclusionsNo serious bleeding or differences in the evolution of MOD were detected between APC and the placebo. Instead we found an increase in serum bilirubin in the APC group compared to the placebo group in patients with SAP.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01017107.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultBilirubinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Organ FailurePancreatitisPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesProtein CRecombinant ProteinsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeBilirubindrotrecogin alfa activatedProtein CRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20663207
PMCPMC2945119
OpenAlexW2131663132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.