ArticleHealth services research2010
Reducing potentially avoidable complications in patients with chronic diseases: the Prometheus Payment approach.
Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Win-Win Pricing of Follow-Up Policies Under Healthcare Warranties for Chronic Diseases: A Mathematical Modeling Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Generation of Integration: The Early Experience of Implementing Bundled Care in Ontario, Canada.The Milbank quarterly · 2018Article
- Measuring Care Continuity: A Comparison of Claims-based Methods.Medical care · 2016Article
- The Theory of Value-Based Payment Incentives and Their Application to Health Care.Health services research · 2015Article
- Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.The Milbank quarterly · 2014Article
- Continuity and the costs of care for chronic disease.JAMA internal medicine · 2014Article
- Episode-based payment: evaluating the impact on chronic conditions.Medicare & medicaid research review · 2013Article
- Comment on de Brantes, Rastogi, and Painter: reducing avoidable complications in patients with chronic diseases: the Prometheus approach.Health services research · 2011Article
- Payment reform. Introduction.Health services research · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledOBJECTIVE (OR STUDY QUESTION): To determine whether a new payment model can reduce current incidence of potentially avoidable complications (PACs) in patients with a chronic illness. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
settingA claims database of 3.5 million commercially insured members under age 65. STUDY
designWe analyzed the database using the Prometheus Payment model's analytical software for six chronic conditions to quantify total costs, proportion spent on PACs, and their variability across the United States. We conducted a literature review to determine the feasibility of reducing PACs. We estimated the financial impact on a prototypical practice if that practice received payments based on the Prometheus Payment model. PRINCIPAL
findingsWe find that (1) PACs consume an average of 28.6 percent of costs for the six chronic conditions studied and vary significantly; (2) reducing PACs to the second decile level would save U.S.$116.7 million in this population; (3) current literature suggests that practices in certain settings could decrease PACs; and (4) using the Prometheus model could create a large potential incentive for a prototypical practice to reduce PACs.
conclusionsBy extrapolating these findings we conclude that costs might be reduced through payment reform efforts. A full extrapolation of these results, while speculative, suggests that total costs associated to the six chronic conditions studied could decrease by 3.8 percent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.