Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20662949›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2010

Reducing potentially avoidable complications in patients with chronic diseases: the Prometheus Payment approach.

Francois De Brantes, Amita Rastogi, Michael Painter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Payment reform. Introduction.Health services research · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francois De BrantesHealth Care Incentives Improvement Institute Inc, 13 Sugar Street, Newtown, CT 06470, USA. francois.debrantes@hci3.org
Amita Rastogi
Michael Painter

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledOBJECTIVE (OR STUDY QUESTION): To determine whether a new payment model can reduce current incidence of potentially avoidable complications (PACs) in patients with a chronic illness. DATA SOURCES/STUDY

settingA claims database of 3.5 million commercially insured members under age 65. STUDY

designWe analyzed the database using the Prometheus Payment model's analytical software for six chronic conditions to quantify total costs, proportion spent on PACs, and their variability across the United States. We conducted a literature review to determine the feasibility of reducing PACs. We estimated the financial impact on a prototypical practice if that practice received payments based on the Prometheus Payment model. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe find that (1) PACs consume an average of 28.6 percent of costs for the six chronic conditions studied and vary significantly; (2) reducing PACs to the second decile level would save U.S.$116.7 million in this population; (3) current literature suggests that practices in certain settings could decrease PACs; and (4) using the Prometheus model could create a large potential incentive for a prototypical practice to reduce PACs.

conclusionsBy extrapolating these findings we conclude that costs might be reduced through payment reform efforts. A full extrapolation of these results, while speculative, suggests that total costs associated to the six chronic conditions studied could decrease by 3.8 percent.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHealth ServicesHealth Services ResearchHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMaleMiddle AgedQuality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareReimbursement MechanismsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20662949
PMCPMC3029843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.