Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20662790›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2010

Metabolic profiling of bile in cholangiocarcinoma using in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Amar W Sharif, Horace R T Williams, Temi Lampejo, Shahid A Khan, Devinder S Bansi, David Westaby, Andrew V Thillainayagam, Howard C Thomas, I Jane Cox, Simon D Taylor-Robinson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Molecular Biomarkers in Cholangiocarcinoma: Focus on Bile.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bile Processing Protocol for Improved Proteomic Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Cholangiocarcinoma 2020: the next horizon in mechanisms and management.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Metabolic rearrangements in primary liver cancers: cause and consequences.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amar W SharifHepatology and Gastroenterology Section, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. amar.sharif@imperial.ac.uk
Horace R T Williams
Temi Lampejo
Shahid A Khan
Devinder S Bansi
David Westaby
Andrew V Thillainayagam
Howard C Thomas
I Jane Cox
Simon D Taylor-Robinson
Imperial College London · GBNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCholangiocarcinoma (CCA) has a poor prognosis and its aetiology is inadequately understood. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of bile may provide insights into the pathogenesis of CCA and help identify novel diagnostic biomarkers. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical composition of bile from patients with CCA with that of bile from patients with benign biliary disease.

methodsMagnetic resonance spectra were acquired from the bile of five CCA patients and compared with MRS of control bile from patients with benign biliary disease (seven with gallstones, eight with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction [SOD], five with primary sclerosing cholangitis [PSC]). Metabolic profiles were compared using both univariate and multivariate pattern-recognition analysis.

resultsUnivariate analysis showed that levels of glycine-conjugated bile acids were significantly increased in patients with CCA, compared with the benign disease groups (P= 0.002). 7 beta primary bile acids were significantly increased (P= 0.030) and biliary phosphatidylcholine (PtC) levels were reduced (P= 0.010) in bile from patients with CCA compared with bile from gallstone patients. These compounds were also of primary importance in the multivariate analysis: the cohorts were differentiated by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).

conclusionsThese preliminary data suggest that altered bile acid and PtC metabolism play an important role in CCA aetiopathogenesis and that specific metabolites may have potential as future biomarkers.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBileBile Acids and SaltsBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCholangiocarcinomaFemaleGlycineHumansLondonMaleBile Acids and SaltsBiomarkers, TumorGlycinePhosphatidylcholines

Identifiers

PMID20662790
PMCPMC3028580
OpenAlexW2118951444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.