Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20662787›Full record

ReviewHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2010

Multimodal management of neuroendocrine liver metastases.

Andrea Frilling, Georgios C Sotiropoulos, Jun Li, Oskar Kornasiewicz, Ursula Plöckinger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Survival predictors ofJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022
    Trial
  6. Efficacy ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2020
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Long-term outcomes of resection versus transplantation for neuroendocrine liver metastases meeting the Milan criteria.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrea FrillingDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK. a.frilling@imperial.ac.uk
Georgios C Sotiropoulos
Jun Li
Oskar Kornasiewicz
Ursula Plöckinger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of neuroendocrine tumours (NET) has increased over the past three decades. Hepatic metastases which occur in up to 75% of NET patients significantly worsen their prognosis. New imaging techniques with increasing sensitivity enabling tumour detection at an early stage have been developed. The treatment encompasses a panel of surgical and non-surgical modalities.

methodsThis article reviews the published literature related to management of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases.

resultsAbdominal computer tomography, magnetic resonance tomography and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy are widely accepted imaging modalities. Hepatic resection is the only potentially curative treatment. Liver transplantation is justified in highly selected patients. Liver-directed interventional techniques and locally ablative measures offer effective palliation. Promising novel therapeutic options offering targeted approaches are under evaluation.

conclusionsThe treatment of neuroendocrine liver metastases still needs to be standardized. Management in centres of expertise should be strongly encouraged in order to enable a multidisciplinary approach and personalized treatment. Development of molecular prognostic factors to select treatment according to patient risk should be attempted.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationChemoembolization, TherapeuticHepatectomyLiver TransplantationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyDiagnostic ImagingHumansLiver NeoplasmsNeuroendocrine TumorsPalliative CarePatient SelectionRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20662787
PMCPMC3028577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.