Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20662629›Full record

Trial reportJournal of women's health (2002)2010

Three city feasibility study of a body empowerment and HIV prevention intervention among women with drug use histories: Women FIT.

Erica L Gollub, Kathleen M Morrow, Kenneth H Mayer, Beryl A Koblin, Pamela Brown Peterside, Marla J Husnik, David S Metzger

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of women's health (2002), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erica L GollubDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work, Florida International University, Miami, Florida 33199, USA. erica.gollub@fiu.edu
Kathleen M Morrow
Kenneth H Mayer
Beryl A Koblin
Pamela Brown Peterside
Marla J Husnik
David S Metzger
Florida International University · USMiriam Hospital · USNew York Blood Center · US

Funding

DOMESTIC MASTER CONTRACT FOR HIV VACCINE EFFICACY TRIALSN01AI035176 · NIAID · ABT ASSOCIATES, INC. · PI SEAGE, GEORGE R · 1993 to 2000
$2.5M
STATISTICAL &CLINICAL COORDINATING CENTER (SC)N01AI045200 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI SELF, STEVEN G. · 1994 to 2000
$853k
NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-35176NIAID NIH HHS N01-AI-45200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew intervention models are needed for HIV prevention among drug-using women.

methodsThe Women Fighting Infection Together (Women FIT) feasibility study enrolled 189 women in three U.S. cities (Providence, New York, Philadelphia) with drug-using histories, who also reported risky sexual behavior. Eligible women had participated previously in a yearlong study of HIV Counseling and Testing (HIV-CT) and limited case management. Two thirds of the sample were black, most were unemployed, and about two thirds reported prior or current crack use. Women were randomized into two groups. In one group, women participated in a manualized, four-session, peer-led, interactive group intervention that stressed body knowledge, woman-initiated HIV/sexually transmitted infection (HIV/STI) prevention, including a focus on women's health (reproductive health screening, sexual violence, self-breast examination, STI signs, symptoms), which aimed to increase comfort with and pride in their bodies. Control group women received HIV-CT enriched by female condom counseling. Outcomes included study retention, session attendance and ratings, changes in knowledge, and use of protection methods.

resultsThe study successfully retained 95% of the participants for a 2-month follow-up. Positive assessments from participants and peer leaders exceeded preset thresholds for success. Pre-post changes in body knowledge (p < 0.0001) and protection methods knowledge (p < 0.01) was greater among the intervention women than the control women.

conclusionsThe body empowerment model deserves further elaboration in interventions focusing on women at high risk of HIV/STI acquisition.

Indexed as

Risk Reduction BehaviorSubstance-Related DisordersFeasibility StudiesFemaleGroup ProcessesHealth EducationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHIV InfectionsHumansMalePatient SelectionPilot ProjectsPower, PsychologicalSafe SexUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20662629
PMCPMC2953934
OpenAlexW2086066327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.