Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20661672›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2010

Treatment of cocaine abuse during pregnancy: translating research to clinical practice.

Lynn Hull, James May, Dawn Farrell-Moore, Dace S Svikis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Substance use during pregnancy.F1000Research · 2016
    Review
  2. Substance Use in the Perinatal Period.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lynn HullVirginia Commonwealth University, Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, AWHARE (Addiction and Women's Health: Advancing Research and Evaluation) Program, Old City Hall, Richmond, VA 23298-0343, USA. hulllc@vcu.edu
James May
Dawn Farrell-Moore
Dace S Svikis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the late-1980s and early-1990s, much attention in America was focused on cocaine abuse. In particular, the effects of prenatal cocaine use on mothers and infants were in the news spotlight. Risks of adverse effects prompted funding for novel treatment programs. More recently, media attention has shifted elsewhere, and specialized treatment resources have grown scarce. This redirection of funding is unfortunate, as social stigma and fear of legal consequences continue to encourage cocaine-abusing pregnant women to hide drug use and avoid prenatal care. The purpose of this article is to summarize the most prominent adverse maternal and fetal/infant effects associated with prenatal cocaine use; review treatment options, focusing on comprehensive care programs of the 1990s as well as recent research on evidence-based practices and their applicability to pregnant women; and highlight the population of prenatal cocaine-abusing women uninterested in treatment, with a focus on promising strategies to promote drug abstinence and other positive health behaviors.

Indexed as

Prenatal CareCocaine-Related DisordersFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsSocial Stigma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.