Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20660798›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research2010

Ethanol wet-bonding technique sensitivity assessed by AFM.

E Osorio, M Toledano, F S Aguilera, F R Tay, R Osorio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

E OsorioDepartment of Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Spain. haketa-mvrk@polka.ocn.ne.jp
M Toledano
F S Aguilera
F R Tay
R Osorio
Universidad de Granada · ESAugusta University · US

Funding

Biomimetic remineralization of resin-dentin bondsR21DE019213 · NIDCR · AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY · PI TAY, FRANKLIN CHI MENG · 2009 to 2010
$362k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE019213NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE019213-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In ethanol wet bonding, water is replaced by ethanol to maintain dehydrated collagen matrices in an extended state to facilitate resin infiltration. Since short ethanol dehydration protocols may be ineffective, this study tested the null hypothesis that there are no differences in ethanol dehydration protocols for maintaining the surface roughness, fibril diameter, and interfibrillar spaces of acid-etched dentin. Polished human dentin surfaces were etched with phosphoric acid and water-rinsed. Tested protocols were: (1) water-rinse (control); (2) 100% ethanol-rinse (1-min); (3) 100% ethanol-rinse (5-min); and (4) progressive ethanol replacement (50-100%). Surface roughness, fibril diameter, and interfibrillar spaces were determined with atomic force microscopy and analyzed by one-way analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls test (α = 0.05). Dentin roughness and fibril diameter significantly decreased when 100% ethanol (1-5 min) was used for rinsing (p < 0.001). Absolute ethanol produced collapse and shrinkage of collagen fibrils. Ascending ethanol concentrations did not collapse the matrix and shrank the fibrils less than absolute ethanol-rinses.

Indexed as

Acid Etching, DentalCollagenDental BondingDentinDesiccationEthanolFibrillar CollagensHumansMaterials TestingMicroscopy, Atomic ForcePhosphoric AcidsSolventsTime FactorsWaterCollagenEthanolFibrillar Collagensphosphoric acidPhosphoric AcidsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID20660798
PMCPMC3144069
OpenAlexW2112549511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.