Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20660721›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2010

Telomerase-immortalized human mammary stem/progenitor cells with ability to self-renew and differentiate.

Xiangshan Zhao, Gautam K Malhotra, Subodh M Lele, Manjiri S Lele, William W West, James D Eudy, Hamid Band, Vimla Band

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Emergence Framework of Carcinogenesis.Frontiers in oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiangshan ZhaoDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Gautam K Malhotra
Subodh M Lele
Manjiri S Lele
William W West
James D Eudy
Hamid Band
Vimla Band
University of Nebraska Medical Center · USCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZ

Funding

ZINC FINGER-INSPIRED FLUORESCENT CHEMOSENSORSP20RR016469 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI TURPEN, JAMES B · 2001 to 2011
$36.2M
TYROSINE KINASE REGULATION VIA PROTEIN DEGRADATIONR01CA087986 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, HAMID · 2000 to 2015
$4.2M
MOLECULAR CONTROL OF EGF RECEPTOR DOWN-REGULATIONR01CA099163 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, HAMID · 2003 to 2012
$3.7M
Targeting Endocytic Recycling of EGF Receptor in Cancer R01CA105489 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, HAMID · 2004 to 2014
$3.0M
A novel regulator of p53 functionR01CA096844 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, VIMLA · 2002 to 2011
$2.7M
ADA3: a novel target for HPV16 E6 oncoproteinR01CA094143 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, VIMLA · 2002 to 2006
$1.7M
ErbB2 Downregulation Through HSP90 InhibitionR01CA116552 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI BAND, HAMID · 2007 to 2011
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA105489NCI NIH HHS CA116552NCI NIH HHS CA87986NCI NIH HHS CA94143NCI NIH HHS CA96844NCI NIH HHS CA99163NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087986NCI NIH HHS R01 CA094143NCI NIH HHS R01 CA096844NCI NIH HHS R01 CA099163NCI NIH HHS R01 CA105489NCI NIH HHS R01 CA116552NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016469
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that breast and other cancers originate from and are maintained by a small fraction of stem/progenitor cells with self-renewal properties. Whether such cancer stem/progenitor cells originate from normal stem cells based on initiation of a de novo stem cell program, by reprogramming of a more differentiated cell type by oncogenic insults, or both remains unresolved. A major hurdle in addressing these issues is lack of immortal human stem/progenitor cells that can be deliberately manipulated in vitro. We present evidence that normal and human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)-immortalized human mammary epithelial cells (hMECs) isolated and maintained in Dana-Farber Cancer Institute 1 (DFCI-1) medium retain a fraction with progenitor cell properties. These cells coexpress basal (K5, K14, and vimentin), luminal (E-cadherin, K8, K18, or K19), and stem/progenitor (CD49f, CD29, CD44, and p63) cell markers. Clonal derivatives of progenitors coexpressing these markers fall into two distinct types--a K5(+)/K19(-) type and a K5(+)/K19(+) type. We show that both types of progenitor cells have self-renewal and differentiation ability. Microarray analyses confirmed the differential expression of components of stem/progenitor-associated pathways, such as Notch, Wnt, Hedgehog, and LIF, in progenitor cells compared with differentiated cells. Given the emerging evidence that stem/progenitor cells serve as precursors for cancers, these cellular reagents represent a timely and invaluable resource to explore unresolved questions related to stem/progenitor origin of breast cancer.

Indexed as

TelomeraseBiomarkersCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell LineCell ProliferationClone CellsGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunophenotypingMammary Glands, HumanStem CellsBiomarkersTelomerase

Identifiers

PMID20660721
PMCPMC2922525
OpenAlexW2124272324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.