Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20660689›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2010

Efficacy and safety of nemonoxacin versus levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia.

Dirkie J J van Rensburg, Reury-Perng Perng, Ismail H Mitha, Andrè J Bester, Joseph Kasumba, Ren-Guang Wu, Ming-Lin Ho, Li-Wen Chang, David T Chung, Yu-Ting Chang and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05002192 (A Retrospective, Real-world Study of Eucalyptol, Limonene and Pinene Enteric Soft Capsules Used in the Expectorant Treatment of Community-acquired Pneumonia), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05002192 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

A Retrospective, Real-world Study of Eucalyptol, Limonene and Pinene Enteric Soft Capsules Used in the Expectorant Treatment of Community-acquired Pneumonia

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Grand Johamu Pharmaceutical Company, Ltd.Ran2020 to 2022Enrolled10,000ConditionsCommunity-acquired PneumoniaArmsEucalyptol, Limonene and Pinene Enteric Soft Capsule, Ambroxol injection, Other oral mucolytic drugs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  5. Assessment of bias in outcomes reported in trials on pneumonia: a systematic review.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Atypical pneumonia (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Frontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dirkie J J van RensburgPark Medical Center, Witbank, Mpumalanga, South Africa.
Reury-Perng Perng
Ismail H Mitha
Andrè J Bester
Joseph Kasumba
Ren-Guang Wu
Ming-Lin Ho
Li-Wen Chang
David T Chung
Yu-Ting Chang
Chi-Hsin R King
Ming-Chu Hsu
TaiGen Biotechnology (Taiwan) · TWChanghua Christian Hospital · TWCheng Ching Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nemonoxacin, a novel nonfluorinated quinolone, exhibits potent in vitro and in vivo activities against community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) pathogens, including multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Patients with mild to moderate CAP (n = 265) were randomized to receive oral nemonoxacin (750 mg or 500 mg) or levofloxacin (500 mg) once daily for 7 days. Clinical responses were determined at the test-of-cure visit in intent-to-treat (ITT), clinical per protocol (PPc), evaluable-ITT, and evaluable-PPc populations. The clinical cure rates for 750 mg nemonoxacin, 500 mg nemonoxacin, and levofloxacin were 89.9%, 87.0%, and 91.1%, respectively, in the evaluable-ITT population; 91.7%, 87.7%, and 90.3%, respectively, in the evaluable-PPc population; 82.6%, 75.3%, and 80.0%, respectively, in the ITT population; and 83.5%, 78.0%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the PPc population. Noninferiority to levofloxacin was demonstrated in both the 750-mg and 500-mg nemonoxacin groups for the evaluable-ITT and evaluable-PPc populations, and also in the 750 mg nemonoxacin group for the ITT and PPc populations. Overall bacteriological success rates were high for all treatment groups in the evaluable-bacteriological ITT population (90.2% in the 750 mg nemonoxacin group, 84.8% in the 500 mg nemonoxacin group, and 92.0% in the levofloxacin group). All three treatments were well tolerated, and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Overall, oral nemonoxacin (both 750 mg and 500 mg) administered for 7 days resulted in high clinical and bacteriological success rates in CAP patients. Further, good tolerability and excellent activity against common causative pathogens were demonstrated. Nemonoxacin (750 mg and 500 mg) once daily is as effective and safe as levofloxacin (500 mg) once daily for the treatment of CAP.

Indexed as

LevofloxacinAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOfloxacinPneumoniaQuinolonesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinnemonoxacinOfloxacinQuinolones

Identifiers

PMID20660689
PMCPMC2944601
OpenAlexW2055321964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.