Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20660123›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2010

Heightened attention to medical privacy: challenges for unbiased sample recruitment and a possible solution.

Ann Butler Nattinger, Liliana E Pezzin, Rodney A Sparapani, Joan M Neuner, Toni K King, Purushottam W Laud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. An algorithm to identify the development of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnosis and treatment of lymphedema after breast cancer: a population-based study.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2013
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Fracture risk and adjuvant hormonal therapy among a population-based cohort of older female breast cancer patients.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ann Butler NattingerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, General Internal Medicine-CLCC, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA. anatting@mcw.edu
Liliana E Pezzin
Rodney A Sparapani
Joan M Neuner
Toni K King
Purushottam W Laud

Funding

OUTCOMES OF OLDER WOMEN WITH EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCERR01CA081379 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI NATTINGER, ANN B · 2000 to 2008
$3.0M
Adoption of osteoporosis screening in older womenK08AG021631 · NIA · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI NEUNER, JOAN MARIE · 2003 to 2007
$632k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081379NCI NIH HHS R01-CA81379NIA NIH HHS K08 AG021631NIA NIH HHS K08-AG21631
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Subject recruitment for epidemiologic studies is associated with major challenges due to privacy laws now common in many countries. Privacy policies regarding recruitment methods vary tremendously across institutions, partly because of a paucity of information about what methods are acceptable to potential subjects. The authors report the utility of an opt-out method without prior physician notification for recruiting community-dwelling US women aged 65 years or older with incident breast cancer in 2003. Participants (n = 3,083) and possibly eligible nonparticipants (n = 2,664) were compared using characteristics derived from billing claims. Participation for persons with traceable contact information was 70% initially (2005-2006) and remained over 90% for 3 follow-up surveys (2006-2008). Older subjects and those living in New York State were less likely to participate, but participation did not differ on the basis of socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, underlying health, or type of cancer treatment. Few privacy concerns were raised by potential subjects, and no complaints were lodged. Using opt-out methods without prior physician notification, a population-based cohort of older breast cancer subjects was successfully recruited. This strategy may be applicable to population-based studies of other diseases and is relevant to privacy boards making decisions about recruitment strategies acceptable to the public.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityEpidemiologic StudiesPatient SelectionAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesData CollectionFemaleHealth Insurance Portability and Accountability ActHumansInsurance Claim ReviewMedicareResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID20660123
PMCPMC3025645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.